Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40434822›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology (Reading, England)2025

From air to insight: the evolution of airborne DNA sequencing technologies.

Mia F G Berelson, Darren Heavens, Paul Nicholson, Matthew D Clark, Richard M Leggett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology (Reading, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mia F G BerelsonEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UZ, UK.
Darren HeavensEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UZ, UK.
Paul NicholsonJohn Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.
Matthew D ClarkNatural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Richard M LeggettEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UZ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, the analysis of airborne biological organisms relied on microscopy and culture-based techniques. However, technological advances such as PCR and next-generation sequencing now provide researchers with the ability to gather vast amounts of data on airborne environmental DNA (eDNA). Studies typically involve capturing airborne biological material, followed by nucleic acid extraction, library preparation, sequencing and taxonomic identification to characterize the eDNA at a given location. These methods have diverse applications, including pathogen detection in agriculture and human health, air quality monitoring, bioterrorism detection and biodiversity monitoring. A variety of methods are used for airborne eDNA analysis, as no single pipeline meets all needs. This review outlines current methods for sampling, extraction, sequencing and bioinformatic analysis, highlighting how different approaches can influence the resulting data and their suitability for specific use cases. It also explores current applications of airborne eDNA sampling and identifies research gaps in the field.

Indexed as

Air MicrobiologyDNA, EnvironmentalHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNABiodiversityComputational BiologyEnvironmental MonitoringHumansDNA, EnvironmentalaireDNAmetabarcodingmetagenomicsmicrobiomenext-generation sequencing (NGS)

Identifiers

PMID40434822
PMCPMC12120143

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.