ArticlePloS one2025
T-RippleGNN: Predicting traffic flow through ripple propagation with attentive graph neural networks.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, accurate traffic flow prediction has become a significant part of intelligent transportation systems, which can not only satisfy citizens' travel need and life satisfaction, but also benefit urban traffic management and control. However, traffic forecasting remains highly challenging because of its complexity in both topology structure and time transformation. Inspired by the propagation idea of graph convolutional networks, we propose ripple-propagation-based attentive graph neural networks for traffic flow prediction (T-RippleGNN). Firstly, we adopt Ripple propagation to capture the topology structure of the traffic spatial model. Then, a GRU-based model is used to explore the traffic model through the timeline. Lastly, those two factors are combined and attention scores are assigned to differentiate their influences on the traffic flow prediction. Furthermore, we evaluate our approach with three real-world traffic datasets. The results show that our approach reduces the prediction errors by approximately 2.24%-62,93% compared with state-of-the-art baselines, and the effectiveness of T-RippleGNN in traffic forecasting is demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.