ReviewMolecules and cells2025
Brief guide to assays for measuring health parameters using Caenorhabditis elegans.
Review in Molecules and cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiple Molecular Pathways to Longevity: Opposing Gene Expression Programs Define Distinct Aging Strategies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Caffeine extends lifespan by enhancing lysosomal lipolysis in Caenorhabditis elegans.Molecules and cells · 2026Article
- Molecules and Cells 2025, highlights from molecules to organisms.Molecules and cells · 2026Article
- Fasting and Caloric Restriction Activate an ADIOL-NHR-91-Kynurenine Pathway Signaling Axis to Promote Healthspan.Aging cell · 2026Article
- Editorial: MiniResource papers from Molecules and Cells.Molecules and cells · 2026Article
- Autophagy: A Double-Edged Sword in the Aging ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Multilayered regulation of longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans.Molecules and cells · 2026Review
- Brief guide to Caenorhabditis elegans survival assays.Molecules and cells · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing health parameters is essential for understanding the decline of physiological functions during aging. The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans serves as a powerful model in aging research. This paper introduces representative methods for evaluating health parameters using C. elegans and provides quantitative indicators of functional declines during aging. This manuscript will be useful for researchers unfamiliar with healthspan studies using C. elegans and may help perform physiological experiments for healthy aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.