SynthesisThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2025
Comparative efficacy of cognitive training modalities in cognitive impairment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Virtual reality-based training in patients with alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy of group versus individual reminiscence therapy for depression in older adults: A network meta-analysis stratified by severity.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Pooled it
- The efficacy of reminiscence therapy on the cognition of older patients with cognitive impairment or dementia: a meta-analysis based on regulatory factors.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2026Pooled it
- Symptomatic treatment for Alzheimer disease: current evidence and future directions.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- From Sensation to Action: Neuroplasticity, Cognitive-Motor Training, and Emerging Biomarkers of Adaptation.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of Multisensory Stimulation on Cognitive Function in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: Protocol for a Systematic Review.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Cognitive rehabilitation after acquired brain injury: knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare professionals in Lebanon.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Observational
- Dysregulation of Immune Mediators and Synaptic Plasticity in Central Nervous System Disorders.Cells · 2026Review
- Robot-Based Cognitive Intervention Effects on Brain Function and Cognition in Patients With Mild Alzheimer's Disease Dementia.Psychiatry investigation · 2026Article
- Advancements in non-pharmaceutical interventions for Alzheimer's disease management: an update review.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCognitive training is a widely utilized non-pharmacological intervention to enhance cognitive performance in individuals with cognitive impairment. Despite its potential, significant ambiguity remains regarding its definition, optimal modalities, and design parameters. It remains unclear which types of cognitive training are relatively optimal for different levels of cognitive impairment or how intervention designs can maximize therapeutic benefits.
objectivesThis systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of various cognitive training modalities on cognitive, psychological, and quality-of-life outcomes in individuals with cognitive impairment. Additionally, it sought to identify optimal intervention approaches, clarify key design parameters, and examine critical factors influencing treatment efficacy.
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted across 12 databases from the establishment of the database until October 24, 2024, to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating cognitive training interventions. Data were analyzed using pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis in Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 18.
resultsTotally 43 RCTs were included. Pairwise meta-analysis revealed that cognitive strategy training demonstrated superior to active control (AC) or passive control (PC) in improving language function, immediate memory, depressive symptoms and quality of life. However, no significant effects were detected regarding cognitive impairment severity, delivery format, interventionist expertise level, training duration, or control type. Network meta-analysis further identified reminiscence therapy as the most pronounced effective intervention for improving global cognition across all stages of cognitive impairment.
conclusionsReminiscence therapy has been demonstrated as a relatively optimal cognitive training modality for enhancing cognitive function in individuals with varying levels of cognitive impairment. Future studies should prioritize longitudinal investigations to validate the durability of therapeutic benefits and incorporate neuroimaging and biomarker analyses to elucidate underlying mechanisms. High-quality RCTs remain imperative to strengthen the evidence base and evaluate the consistency of effects across diverse cognitive training interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.