ArticleScientific reports2025
Ophthalmologic and serologic predictors of positive minor salivary gland biopsy in suspected Sjögren's disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patterns of referral and histopathological interpretation of minor salivary gland biopsy in suspected Sjögren's disease: a single-center experience.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To examine the relation between histopathology, ANA subtypes, and high-resolution dry eye analysis in treatment-naive patients evaluated for Sjögren's disease suspicion in a referral center. Between October 2022 and December 2023, 231 patients who underwent minor salivary gland biopsies were included in the study. Patients were grouped according to their Chisholm and Mason (CM) biopsy scores. Non-invasive ocular surface evaluations and ANA subtype analysis, according to the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP), were also conducted. Meibomian gland (MG) atrophy was significantly higher (p 0.02) in the positive biopsy group (OR 1.02), although it was a weaker predictor than other parameters. Anti-SSA positivity was markedly correlated with positive biopsy results. However, subtype analysis did not show any significant correlation. In predicting CM scores > 2, ANA positivity was 2.1-fold, SSA positivity was 3.6-fold, Schirmer positivity was 12, fivefold, positive ocular OSS scores were fourfold, limbal redness, and NiBUT less than 10 s were 2.4-fold more significant determinant factors. Our results confirm that the Schirmer test and classical serologic markers are still irreplaceable. We believe that novel measurement techniques that enable faster, non-invasive analyses with advanced technology will facilitate the differential diagnosis of Sjögren's disease in patients with dry eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.