Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40436916›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Deep learning reconstruction enhances tophus detection in a dual-energy CT phantom study.

Sydney Alexandra Schmolke, Torsten Diekhoff, Jürgen Mews, Karim Khayata, Maximilian Kotlyarov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sydney Alexandra SchmolkeDepartment of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Torsten DiekhoffDepartment of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. torsten.diekhoff@charite.de.
Jürgen MewsCanon Medical Systems Europe, Amstelveen, The Netherlands.
Karim KhayataDepartment of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Maximilian KotlyarovDepartment of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to compare two deep learning reconstruction (DLR) techniques (AiCE mild; AiCE strong) with two established methods-iterative reconstruction (IR) and filtered back projection (FBP)-for the detection of monosodium urate (MSU) in dual-energy computed tomography (DECT). An ex vivo bio-phantom and a raster phantom were prepared by inserting syringes containing different MSU concentrations and scanned in a 320-rows volume DECT scanner at different tube currents. The scans were reconstructed in a soft tissue kernel using the four reconstruction techniques mentioned above, followed by quantitative assessment of MSU volumes and image quality parameters, i.e., signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Both DLR techniques outperformed conventional IR and FBP in terms of volume detection and image quality. Notably, unlike IR and FBP, the two DLR methods showed no positive correlation of the MSU detection rate with the CT dose index (CTDIvol) in the bio-phantom. Our study highlights the potential of DLR for DECT imaging in gout, where it offers enhanced detection sensitivity, improved image contrast, reduced image noise, and lower radiation exposure. Further research is needed to assess the clinical reliability of this approach.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGoutImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedUric AcidHumansSignal-To-Noise RatioUric AcidDual-energy CTGouty arthritisImaging phantoms

Identifiers

PMID40436916
PMCPMC12119995

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.