Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40437202›Full record

ReviewNature ecology & evolution2025

Precision ecology for targeted conservation action.

Rebecca Spake, Eleanor E Jackson, James M Bullock, Emma Gardner, Elizabeth Tipton, Matthew J Grainger, C Patrick Doncaster

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature ecology & evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rebecca SpakeSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK. R.Spake@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4671-2225
Eleanor E JacksonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9884-2972
James M BullockUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0529-4020
Emma GardnerUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1669-7151
Elizabeth TiptonDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5608-1282
Matthew J GraingerNorwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8426-6495
C Patrick DoncasterSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9406-0693

Funding

RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NE/V007831/1RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NE/X009998/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Addressing the coupled threats of catastrophic climate change and biodiversity loss requires implementation of conservation and restoration actions globally. However, on-the-ground action is hindered by context dependency: the ubiquitous challenge that implementation outcomes vary from place to place due to complex dependencies among social and ecological drivers. Policymakers and practitioners recognize the need to tailor solutions to contexts, and target actions to places where they will work effectively. To provide information for decision-making, applied ecologists can learn from medicine and marketing, which aim to provide healthcare tailored to individual patients, and advertisements targeting individual tastes. These disciplines exploit big data and rapidly developing computational advances to predict treatment effects for individual units. Here we argue why and how ecological disciplines can begin to capitalize on these rich advances, to equip ecologists with a potentially powerful toolkit for applying big data to site-specific interventions, allowing effective conservation over large extents. We review approaches that hold promise for applied ecology, identify hurdles that must be overcome and propose a roadmap for establishing the conditions that will permit adoption of precision ecology.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcologyBiodiversityClimate Change

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.