ArticleBMC health services research2025
Why they come, why they stay and why they leave: a survey to understand the drivers of recruitment, retention, and attrition of allied health clinicians in an Australian metropolitan health network.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Underfunded and undervalued: community-based health promotion practitioners' experiences of Western Australia's prevention sector.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- Factors that influence joy at work and job satisfaction for allied health professionals in public health services: a theory-informed qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile allied health plays a central role in healthcare, workforce challenges are straining the sector. Challenges are shaped by population changes, emerging models of care, and educational limitations, and were exacerbated by COVID-19. This study aimed to identify drivers of recruitment and retention for allied health clinicians in an Australian metropolitan setting. Identifying and addressing these factors is essential to the design and implementation of tailored, evidence-informed workforce strategy and policy.
methodsThis cross-sectional, online survey explored workplace attraction, job seeking behaviours, and workplace perceptions. 29 Likert-scale statements informed by the existing literature examined factors influencing allied health retention. Allied health employees from a single Australian metropolitan health network were invited to participate. Descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and deductive content analysis were undertaken.
results42.6% (n = 593) of those invited participated in the survey, with 45.7% (n = 271) of participants having been with the organisation for six or more years. 35% (n = 197) of respondents to a question about intention to leave agreed that they aimed to leave their current role within six months. Variables associated with intention to leave were not feeling a sense of satisfaction with their role (odds ratio [OR] 1.51, 95% CI 1.22-1.85), not being recognised and rewarded by the team manager (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.12-1.67), not working in the preferred clinical area (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.25-1.95), and feeling burned out by the job (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.16-1.78). Qualitative findings support the centrality of aspects of the job (job characteristics), the organisational context (rewards offered; climate; organisational support) and person-context interface (peer/group relations; work-life conflict) to attraction, retention, and attrition in roles.
conclusionThis study identifies factors affecting recruitment, retention, and attrition of allied health professionals in a metropolitan setting. Findings are impacted by the personal and professional effects of the COVID-19 pandemic response. Results provide a baseline upon which the impact of interventions can be measured, while informing the prioritisation and design of tailored workforce strategies. Further, findings may inform local policy responses to improve the allied health workforce and ensure excellent care for the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.