ArticleAIDS care2025
Who could benefit the most from long-acting antiretroviral therapy? perspectives of HIV care providers and people with HIV in Florida.
Article in AIDS care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Injectable cabotegravir/rilpivirine (CAB/RPV) is now available, and other long-acting antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens are in development. The present study describes the factors that HIV care providers and people with HIV (PWH) in Florida (a high HIV incidence and prevalence setting) consider when assessing populations of PWH who could benefit from long-acting ART. We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 11 providers (27% non-Hispanic Black, 27% Hispanic, 73% cis women) and 16 PWH (31% non-Hispanic Black, 19% Hispanic, 50% cis men, 69% aged 50+) from five sites in Florida. Participants were asked about the groups of PWH who they thought could benefit the most from long-acting ART. Responses were analyzed using a reflexive thematic approach. Seven populations of PWH who could benefit from long-acting ART were identified: 1) younger PWH, 2) PWH with co-occurring conditions, 3) PWH who use substances, 4) PWH experiencing housing instability, 5) PWH with frequent travel, 6) PWH experiencing stigma, and 7) PWH who reliably take medication and engage in care. Many groups who may be excluded from injectable CAB/RPV based on the current guidelines were seen as potentially benefiting from such an option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.