ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2025
Digital Dementia Education and Training for Informal Carers: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Reminiscence Therapy for Caregivers of Family Members With Dementia.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Digital health platforms for intrinsic capacity monitoring in community-based integrated care for older adults: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDementia education is critical for equipping informal carers with the necessary skills and knowledge to provide effective care. However, delivering comprehensive and accessible education remains challenging, particularly in resource-limited settings. Digital tools have emerged as innovative solutions to bridge these gaps, yet limited attention has been given to how such interventions are implemented in diverse caregiving contexts.
aimThis scoping review aims to identify, synthesise and critically map the implementation strategies employed in digital education programmes designed for informal carers of people living with dementia. It also explores the contextual challenges and enabling factors associated with adopting and delivering such interventions across different care settings.
methodA scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA-ScR and JBI guidelines. The study adheres to the PRISMA-ScR checklist to ensure transparent and comprehensive reporting. Comprehensive searches were performed in eleven databases, covering studies published up to February 2024. Out of 2747 identified records, duplicates were removed and studies were screened based on predefined inclusion criteria. Ultimately, 18 studies were included in the review.
resultsThe findings revealed three core areas: (a) types of digital tools used, including online platforms, video conferencing, mobile applications and SMS services; (b) educational domains addressed, such as knowledge and skills, psychological support, communication and social interaction, and environmental and technological adaptation; and (c) implementation strategies and outcomes, highlighting personalisation, cultural sensitivity and technological adaptability, which improved knowledge, emotional well-being and carer self-efficacy. Based on these findings, a theoretical framework was developed that proposed a progressive model-Foundational, Competency and Growth-that aligns digital tools with carers' evolving needs and caregiving stages.
conclusionThe scoping review demonstrates the potential of digital tools in informal carers' dementia education. To optimise their effectiveness, educational strategies should integrate active, adaptive and culturally tailored approaches, addressing carers' needs at both individual and systemic levels. Future research should explore the scalability, inclusivity and long-term impact of digital dementia education programmes to enhance carer support and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.