Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40437768›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2025

Muscle regeneration is improved by hot water immersion but unchanged by cold following a simulated musculoskeletal injury in humans.

Valentin Dablainville, Adèle Mornas, Tom Normand-Gravier, Maha Al-Mulla, Emmanouil Papakostas, Bruno Olory, Theodorakys Marin Fermin, Frantzeska Zampeli, Nelda Nader, Marine Alhammoud and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05506514 (Heat Therapy to Accelerate Muscle Recovery), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05506514 nacompletednot on this map

Heat Therapy to Accelerate Muscle Recovery

TypeinterventionalSponsorAspetarRan2022 to 2024Enrolled34ConditionsMuscle DamageArmsWater immersion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Valentin DablainvilleAspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Research and Scientific Support Department, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-4197-531X
Adèle MornasFrench Institute of Sport (INSEP), Laboratory Sport, Expertise and Performance (EA 7370), Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8812-2904
Tom Normand-GravierDMEM, University of Montpellier, INRAE, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3507-087X
Maha Al-MullaAspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Research and Scientific Support Department, Doha, Qatar.
Emmanouil PapakostasAspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Surgery Department, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0003-1339-7900
Bruno OloryAspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Surgery Department, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-3694-6258
Theodorakys Marin FerminAspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Surgery Department, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-1698-9517
Frantzeska ZampeliAspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Surgery Department, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-0222-2964
Nelda NaderAspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Research and Scientific Support Department, Doha, Qatar.
Marine AlhammoudAspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Surgery Department, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-0461-6051
Freya BayneSport and Exercise Science Research Centre, School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9457-1290
Anthony M J SanchezFaculty of Sports Sciences, Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Performance Santé Environnement de Montagne (LIPSEM), UR4640, University of Perpignan Via Domitia (UPVD), Font-Romeu, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3054-6349
Marco CardinaleAspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Research and Scientific Support Department, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-2777-8707
Robin CandauDMEM, University of Montpellier, INRAE, Montpellier, France.
Henri BernardiDMEM, University of Montpellier, INRAE, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3570-8925
Sébastien RacinaisAspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Research and Scientific Support Department, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0003-0348-4744

Funding

Aspire Zone Foundation 2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryotherapy is a popular strategy for the treatment of skeletal muscle injuries. However, its effect on post-injury human muscle regeneration remains unclear. In contrast, promising results recently emerged using heat therapy to facilitate recovery from muscle injury. This study aimed to examine the effect of three different thermal treatments on muscle recovery and regeneration following a simulated injury in humans. Thirty-four participants underwent a muscle damage protocol induced by electrically stimulated eccentric contractions triggering regenerative processes following myofibre necrosis. Thereafter, participants were exposed to daily lower body water immersion for 10 days in cold (CWI, 15 min at 12°C), thermoneutral (TWI, 30 min at 32°C) or hot water immersion (HWI, 60 min at 42°C). Muscle biopsies were sampled before and at +5 (D5) and +11 (D11) days post-damage. None of the water immersions differed in recovery of force-generating capacity (P = 0.108). HWI induced a lower perceived muscle pain than TWI (P = 0.035) and lower levels of circulating creatine kinase (P ≤ 0.012) and myoglobin (P < 0.001) than TWI and CWI. Contrary to our hypothesis, CWI did not improve perceived muscle pain or reduce circulating markers of muscle damage (P ≥ 0.207). Expression of heat shock proteins 27 and 70 was significantly increased in HWI (P < 0.038) at D11 and appeared blunted using CWI. Furthermore, nuclear factor-κB expression significantly increased in all conditions except HWI, while interleukin-10 was upregulated only in HWI at D11 (P = 0.014). In conclusion, our results support the use of HWI but not cold, to improve muscle regeneration following an injury. KEY POINTS: Cryotherapy and heat therapy are popular strategies in the treatment of skeletal muscle injury; however, existing literature is equivocal, and their effects on human muscle regeneration remain unknown. We investigated the effect of three thermal treatments (cold water immersion (CWI): 15 min at 12°C; thermoneutral water immersion (TWI): 30 min at 32°C; or hot water immersion (HWI): 60 min at 42°C) performed daily for 10 days following electrically stimulated eccentric muscle damage inducing regenerative mechanisms. CWI did not improve chronic perceived muscle pain nor reduce circulating markers of muscle damage. HWI limited chronic perceived pain and circulating markers of muscle damage, potentially influenced inflammatory mechanisms, and increased the expression of heat shock proteins. HWI appears more beneficial than CWI in improving muscle regeneration after a muscle injury.

Indexed as

Cold TemperatureCryotherapyHot TemperatureMuscle, SkeletalRegenerationAdultCreatine KinaseFemaleHumansImmersionMaleMyoglobinWaterYoung AdultCreatine KinaseMyoglobinWaterCWIdamageelectrically stimulated eccentric contractionHWImuscle injury

Identifiers

PMID40437768
PMCPMC12666504

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.