Evidence mapPaperPMID 40437821Full record

ReviewDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2025

Why, how and in whom should we measure levels of lipoprotein(a): A review of the latest evidence and clinical implications.

Alexander C Razavi, Harpreet S Bhatia, Roger S Blumenthal, Michael D Shapiro, Anurag Mehta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Heterogeneity in Lipoprotein(a) Profile Changes Across the Menopausal Transition.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Lipoprotein(a): structural basis, bidirectional risk, and therapeutic frontiers.Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2026
    Article
  6. Lipoprotein(a) testing trends in young ischemic stroke patients from 2015-2024: An analysis of 188,000 individuals.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexander C RazaviEmory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Harpreet S BhatiaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Roger S BlumenthalCiccarone Center for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Michael D ShapiroSection on Cardiovascular Medicine, Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Anurag MehtaVCU Health Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6910-5551

Funding

Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Elevated Lipoprotein(a)K08HL166962 · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · 2025 to 2025
$169k
89BioAmgenArrowheadBoehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CleerlyEsperionIonis PharmaceuticalsLillyMerckNational Heart, Lung and Blood Institute F32HL172499National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute L30HL175751NewAmsterdam PharmaNHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL172499NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL166962NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL175751NIH HHS 1K08HL166962Novartis
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined, causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD). Despite robust evidence from epidemiological and genetic studies, Lp(a) remains underrecognised in clinical practice due to challenges in measurement, lack of guideline familiarity and limited therapeutic options. In this narrative review, we summarise the pathophysiological mechanisms linking Lp(a) to atherogenesis, thrombosis and inflammation, emphasising its unique structural features and causal role in cardiovascular disease. We discuss assay methodologies and make the case for a single lifetime measurement given the genetic stability of Lp(a). We review guideline-based indications for testing, highlighting high-risk populations such as those with premature ASCVD, a family history of cardiovascular disease and individuals of African or South Asian ancestry. We additionally outline clinical strategies to reduce ASCVD risk in individuals with elevated Lp(a), including lifestyle optimisation, statin therapy, PCSK9 inhibitors, and aspirin in select populations. Emerging targeted therapies, including antisense oligonucleotides and siRNA-based agents, demonstrate up to 90% Lp(a) reduction and are currently being evaluated in large-scale cardiovascular outcomes trials. As precision medicine advances, Lp(a) represents both a critical risk factor and a promising therapeutic target. Broader implementation of Lp(a) testing, particularly in high-risk individuals, will help improve ASCVD prevention efforts.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisAtherosclerosisCalcinosisCardiovascular DiseasesLipoprotein(a)Aortic ValveHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsRisk FactorsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLipoprotein(a)cardiovascular diseasedyslipidaemialipid‐lowering therapymacrovascular disease

Identifiers

PMID40437821
PMCPMC12354239

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.