Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40437982›Full record

SynthesisCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2025

A Systematic Review on the Use of Intravascular Ultrasound and Optical Coherence Tomography During Femoropopliteal Endovascular Intervention.

Lisa Rutten, Stan E J Reijnen, Lennart van de Velde, Michel Versluis, Michel M P J Reijnen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisa RuttenMulti-Modality Medical Imaging Group, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1781-956X
Stan E J ReijnenFaculty of Medicine, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3673-6667
Lennart van de VeldeMulti-Modality Medical Imaging Group, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8804-8671
Michel VersluisPhysics of Fluids Group, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2296-1860
Michel M P J ReijnenMulti-Modality Medical Imaging Group, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5021-1768

Funding

This work was co-financed by Holland High Tech with PPP allowance for research and development in the top sector HTSM, in collaboration with Abbott Vascular.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Performing adjunctive intravascular imaging during femoropopliteal endovascular intervention could improve treatment planning and outcome. This systematic review assessed how imaging findings of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) can contribute to improving treatment planning and outcomes of patients with femoropopliteal arterial disease. Scopus and PubMed databases were searched from January 2011 to July 2023 for all studies reporting on the use of IVUS or OCT imaging findings in the treatment of femoropopliteal disease. The effect of IVUS and OCT imaging findings on treatment plan and outcome, as well as the predictive ability of IVUS and OCT for treatment outcome, were analyzed. A total of 42 studies (one randomized-controlled trial, 17 prospective, 20 retrospective, and four descriptive studies), 34 involving IVUS, seven OCT, and one both, were included. IVUS-assessed diameters were significantly larger, and lesion length was longer compared to angiography, which affected treatment planning. OCT-measured diameters were significantly larger than angiography at follow-up and did not differ significantly from IVUS except for one location. Both IVUS and OCT identified more dissections, calcifications, residual stenoses, and inadequate stent expansion than angiography, impacting treatment planning. IVUS-assessed imaging findings were associated with reduced restenosis at 1 and 2-year follow-up compared to angiography alone, while for OCT, data was limited. IVUS and OCT can visualize complementary imaging features compared to angiography alone that change the treatment plan of patients with femoropopliteal disease, both pre- and post-treatment. IVUS has the potential to improve treatment outcomes, whereas there is still limited evidence for OCT.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresFemoral ArteryPeripheral Arterial DiseasePopliteal ArteryTomography, Optical CoherenceUltrasonography, InterventionalAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsTreatment Outcomeintravascular ultrasoundoptical coherence tomographyperipheral arterial disease

Identifiers

PMID40437982
PMCPMC12336785

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.