Evidence mapPaperPMID 40438124Full record

ArticleBiomaterials research2025

Label-Free Prediction of Fluorescently Labeled Fibrin Networks.

Sarah Eldeen, Andres Felipe Guerrero Ramirez, Bora Keresteci, Peter D Chang, Elliot L Botvinick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah EldeenDepartment of Mathematical, Computational, and Systems Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Andres Felipe Guerrero RamirezDepartment of Mathematical, Computational, and Systems Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Bora KeresteciDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Peter D ChangDepartment of Radiological Sciences and Computer Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Elliot L BotvinickDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9837-805X

Funding

Mathematical, Computational and Systems BiologyT32GM136624 · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · 2025 to 2025
$505k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL085339NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM136624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While fluorescent labeling has been the standard for visualizing fibers within fibrillar scaffold models of the extracellular matrix (ECM), the use of fluorescent dyes can compromise cell viability and photobleach prematurely. The intricate fibrillar composition of ECM is crucial for its viscoelastic properties, which regulate intracellular signaling and provide structural support for cells. Naturally derived biomaterials such as fibrin and collagen replicate these fibrillar structures, but longitudinal confocal imaging of fibers using fluorescent dyes may impact cell function and photobleach the sample long before termination of the experiment. An alternative technique is reflection confocal microscopy (RCM) that provides high-resolution images of fibers. However, RCM is sensitive to fiber orientation relative to the optical axis, and consequently, many fibers are not detected. We aim to recover these fibers. Here, we propose a deep learning tool for predicting fluorescently labeled optical sections from unlabeled image stacks. Specifically, our model is conditioned to reproduce fluorescent labeling using RCM images at 3 laser wavelengths and a single laser transmission image. The model is implemented using a fully convolutional image-to-image mapping architecture with a hybrid loss function that includes both low-dimensional statistical and high-dimensional structural components. Upon convergence, the proposed method accurately recovers 3-dimensional fibrous architecture without substantial differences in fiber length or fiber count. However, the predicted fibers were slightly wider than original fluorescent labels (0.213 ± 0.009 μm). The model can be implemented on any commercial laser scanning microscope, providing wide use in the study of ECM biology.

Identifiers

PMID40438124
PMCPMC12117218

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.