Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40438269›Full record

ArticleNEJM AI2025

Machine Learning Achieves Pathologist-Level Coeliac Disease Diagnosis.

F Jaeckle, J Denholm, B Schreiber, S C Evans, M N Wicks, J Y H Chan, A C Bateman, S Natu, M J Arends, E Soilleux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NEJM AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. State of clinical AI in 2026.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. The comparative pathology workbench: An update.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

F Jaeckle *Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, CB2 1QP, Cambridge, England, UK.
J Denholm *Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, CB2 1QP, Cambridge, England, UK.
B Schreiber *Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, CB2 1QP, Cambridge, England, UK.
S C EvansDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, CB2 1QP, Cambridge, England, UK.
M N WicksEdinburgh Pathology & Centre for Comparative Pathology, Institute of Genetics & Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK.
J Y H ChanCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
A C BatemanUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
S NatuUniversity Hospital of North Tees, North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Hardwick, Stockton on Tees, England, UK.
M J ArendsEdinburgh Pathology & Centre for Comparative Pathology, Institute of Genetics & Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK.
E SoilleuxDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, CB2 1QP, Cambridge, England, UK.

Funding

Department of Health NIHR205502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of coeliac disease (CD), an autoimmune disorder with an estimated global prevalence of around 1%, generally relies on the histological examination of duodenal biopsies. However, inter-pathologist agreement for coeliac disease diagnosis is estimated to be no more than 80%. We aim to improve coeliac disease diagnosis by developing a novel, accurate, machine-learning-based diagnostic classifier. Methods: We present a machine learning model that diagnoses the presence or absence of coeliac disease from a set of duodenal biopsies representative of real-world clinical data. Our model was trained on a diverse dataset of 3,383 -slide images (WSIs) of H&E-stained duodenal biopsies from four hospitals featuring five different WSI scanners along with their clinical diagnoses. We trained our model using the multiple-instance-learning paradigm in a weakly-supervised manner with cross-validation and evaluated it on an independent test set featuring 644 unseen scans from a different regional NHS Trust. Additionally, we compared the model's predictions to independent diagnoses from four specialist pathologists on a subset of the test data. Results: Our model diagnosed coeliac disease in an independent test set from a previously unseen source with accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity exceeding 95% and an area under the ROC curve exceeding 99%. These results indicate that the model has the potential to outperform pathologists. In comparing the model's predictions to diagnoses on unseen test data from four independent pathologists, we found statistically indistinguishable results between pathologist-pathologist and pathologist-model inter-observer agreement ( Conclusions: Our model achieved pathologist-level performance in diagnosing the presence or absence of coeliac disease from a representative set of duodenal biopsies, representing a significant advancement towards the adoption of machine learning in clinical practice. Additionally, it demonstrated strong generalisability, performing equally well on biopsies from a previously unseen hospital. We concluded that our model has the potential to revolutionise duodenal biopsy diagnosis by accurately identifying or ruling out coeliac disease, thereby significantly reducing the time required for pathologists to make a diagnosis.

Identifiers

PMID40438269
PMCPMC7617718

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.