ArticleJAMIA open2025
Evaluating clinicians' attitudes toward a web-based tool to support culturally and medically tailored nutrition services at the point of care.
Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Despite growing recognition of the critical role of nutrition in promoting population health, clinicians lack access to point-of-care resources to support culturally relevant nutrition services. This study aims to (1) evaluate Registered Dietitian Nutritionists' (RDN) likelihood of using a web-based tool to provide culturally- and medically tailored nutrition services, (2) identify needed or preferred features, and (3) examine concerns related to the development or implementation of a web-based tool. Materials and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, online survey of RDNs providing nutrition services in healthcare settings across the U.S. involving closed- and open-ended questions. Results: Of 155 RDNs, over 70% indicated being very or extremely likely to use a point-of-care web-based tool. Respondents sought content such as culturally-relevant recipes and an accessible tool that would integrate into their workflow. Concerns were related to quality of information provided and technical considerations such as data privacy. Discussion: Development of a web-based tool to support culturally- and medically tailored nutrition services may fill an unmet need within the healthcare workforce. This tool could be used as a point-of-care resource to optimize patient care and cultural inclusivity and could also function as a sustainable educational resource. Engaging culturally diverse patients and clinicians in tool development is critical for ensuring accessibility and optimal scope and quality of content. Privacy and security of information is essential to developing a trustworthy and equitable tool. Conclusion: Our findings suggest the need for a point of care web-based tool to support culturally- and medically tailored nutrition services across healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.