Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40438553›Full record

ArticleAdvances in laboratory medicine2025

Data science applied to the assessment of biological variation estimates.

Fernando Marques-Garcia, Ana Nieto-Librero, Nerea Gonzalez-García, Xavier Tejedor-Ganduxé, Cristina Martinez-Bravo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in laboratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fernando Marques-GarciaLaboratory Medicine Department, Laboratori Clínic Metropolitana Nord, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana Nieto-LibreroDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Nerea Gonzalez-GarcíaDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Xavier Tejedor-GanduxéLaboratory Medicine Department, Laboratori Clínic Metropolitana Nord, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Cristina Martinez-BravoLaboratory Medicine Department, Laboratori Clínic Metropolitana Nord, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Data science is an umbrella term encompassing a set of tools and processes that make it possible to extract new information from structured or unstructured databases. This scientific discipline is gaining relevance in healthcare. In the clinical laboratory, the multiple applications of data science include the development of algorithms for obtaining population-based reference intervals or biological variation (BV) estimates. These algorithms contribute to overcoming the drawbacks of traditional or direct methods. Content: A review was performed of the state-of-the-art in algorithm-based methods for obtaining BV estimates using Real-World Data (RWD) in the field of data science. Summary: A description is provided of the structure of the algorithms currently available for obtaining BV estimates based on the scientific evidence available. An overview is provided of the advantages and drawbacks of direct methods. Outlook: The use of RWD to obtain BV estimates is a novel discipline with a considerable potential for improving our understanding of BV.

Indexed as

biological variationdata scienceestimates

Identifiers

PMID40438553
PMCPMC12107409

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.