ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Biomarker identification associated with M2 tumor-associated macrophage infiltration in glioblastoma.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting the C3 signaling axis of the complement system: immune microenvironment regulation and emerging therapeutic strategies for glioblastoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Integrating single-cell RNA-Seq and machine learning to dissect a novel Palmitoylation-related prognostic signature of glioblastoma.BMC neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: M2 phenotype tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) can promote tumor growth, invasion, chemotherapy resistance and so on, leading to malignant progression. The aim of this study was to identify novel prognostic profiles in glioblastoma (GBM) by integrating single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) with bulk RNA-seq. Methods: We identified M2-associated genes by intersecting TAM marker genes derived from scRNA-seq with macrophage module genes from WGCNA RNA-seq data. Prognostic M2 TAM-related genes were determined using univariate Cox and LASSO regression analyses. In the following steps, prognostic characteristics, risk groups, and external validation were constructed and validated. The immune landscape of patients with GBM was examined by evaluating immune cells, functions, evasion scores, and checkpoint genes. Results: Analysis of scRNA-seq and bulk-seq data revealed 107 genes linked to M2 TAMs. Using univariate Cox and LASSO regression, 16 genes were identified as prognostic for GBM, leading to the creation and validation of a prognostic signature for GBM survival prediction. Conclusion: Our findings reveal the immune landscape of GBM and enhance understanding of the molecular mechanisms associated with M2 TAMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.