Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40438737›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2025

Integration of smart sensors and IOT in precision agriculture: trends, challenges and future prospectives.

Sheikh Mansoor, Shahzad Iqbal, Simona M Popescu, Song Lim Kim, Yong Suk Chung, Jeong-Ho Baek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Artificial intelligence-driven advancements in agricultural biotechnology.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. CeOPlant molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sheikh Mansoor *Phenomics Laboratory, Department of Plant Resources and Environment, Jeju National University, Jeju, Republic of Korea.
Shahzad Iqbal *Department of Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Applied Energy System, Jeju National University, Jeju, Republic of Korea.
Simona M PopescuDepartment of Biology and Environmental Engineering, University of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Song Lim KimNational Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Yong Suk ChungPhenomics Laboratory, Department of Plant Resources and Environment, Jeju National University, Jeju, Republic of Korea.
Jeong-Ho BaekNational Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Jeonju, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional farming methods, effective for generations, struggle to meet rising global food demands due to limitations in productivity, efficiency, and sustainability amid climate change and resource scarcity. Precision agriculture presents a viable solution by optimizing resource use, enhancing efficiency, and fostering sustainable practices through data-driven decision-making supported by advanced sensors and Internet of Things (IoT) technologies. This review examines various smart sensors used in precision agriculture, including soil sensors for moisture, pH, and plant stress sensors etc. These sensors deliver real-time data that enables informed decision-making, facilitating targeted interventions like optimized irrigation, fertilization, and pest management. Additionally, the review highlights the transformative role of IoT in precision agriculture. The integration of sensor networks with IoT platforms allows for remote monitoring, data analysis via artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), and automated control systems, enabling predictive analytics to address challenges such as disease outbreaks and yield forecasting. However, while precision agriculture offers significant benefits, it faces challenges including high initial investment costs, complexities in data management, needs for technical expertise, data security and privacy concerns, and issues with connectivity in remote agricultural areas. Addressing these technological and economic challenges is essential for maximizing the potential of precision agriculture in enhancing global food security and sustainability. Therefore, in this review we explore the latest trends, challenges, and opportunities associated with IoT enabled smart sensors in precision agriculture.

Indexed as

automationbig datachallengesIoTprecision agriculturesmart sensors

Identifiers

PMID40438737
PMCPMC12116683

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.