Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40438741›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Deep learning-based anomaly detection for precision field crop protection.

Cheng Wei, Yifeng Shan, MengZhe Zhen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cheng WeiChongqing Business Vocational College, Chongqing, China.
Yifeng ShanNingbo University of Finance and Economics, School of Basic Education, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
MengZhe ZhenNingbo University of Finance and Economics, School of Digital Technology and Engineering, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Precision agriculture relies on advanced technologies to optimize crop protection and resource utilization, ensuring sustainable and efficient farming practices. Anomaly detection plays a critical role in identifying and addressing irregularities, such as pest outbreaks, disease spread, or nutrient deficiencies, that can negatively impact yield. Traditional methods struggle with the complexity and variability of agricultural data collected from diverse sources. Methods: To address these challenges, we propose a novel framework that integrates the Integrated Multi-Modal Smart Farming Network (IMSFNet) with the Adaptive Resource Optimization Strategy (AROS). IMSFNet employs multimodal data fusion and spatiotemporal modeling to provide accurate predictions of crop health and yield anomalies by leveraging data from UAVs, satellites, ground sensors, and weather stations. AROS dynamically optimizes resource allocation based on real-time environmental feedback and multi-objective optimization, balancing yield maximization, cost efficiency, and environmental sustainability. Results: Experimental evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in detecting anomalies and improving decision-making in precision agriculture. Discussion: This framework sets a new standard for sustainable and data-driven crop protection strategies.

Indexed as

anomaly detectionmulti-modal data fusionprecision agricultureresource optimizationsustainable farming

Identifiers

PMID40438741
PMCPMC12116526

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.