Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40438820›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Review of Adult Critical Care Calls to the Out-of-Hours Resident Pharmacist Service: A Retrospective Single-Center Observation Study.

Jiaxian Wang, Janique Waghorn, Stephanie Khoo, Hementiben Patel, Christopher Remmington

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiaxian WangInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, GBR.
Janique WaghornInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, GBR.
Stephanie KhooPharmacy and Adult Critical Care, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Hementiben PatelPharmacy and Adult Critical Care, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Christopher RemmingtonPharmacy and Adult Critical Care, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background There is good evidence describing on-call pharmacy services internationally; however, there is limited evidence evaluating out-of-hours (OOH) calls from adult critical care units. Our primary objective is to describe the characteristics of OOH calls from adult critical care units to resident pharmacists, to inform service provision to this high-risk specialty. Our secondary objective is to compare the characteristics of calls during evening and nighttime hours. Methods This is a retrospective observational review of adult critical care OOH calls received by resident pharmacists from August 2023 to July 2024 at a large tertiary center. OOH calls were defined as calls received from 5 pm to 9 am Monday to Sunday, and we further differentiated the calls into evening calls (5 pm to 9 pm) and nighttime calls (9 pm to 9 am). We collected the characteristics of OOH calls, i.e., patient age and sex, ward location, type of query (medicines information/advice or supply), drug requested, category of drug, route of administration, day of the week, date and time of call received, and duration to resolution of call. We compared the characteristics of OOH calls during the evening (5 pm to 9 pm) vs. nighttime (9 pm to 9 am) using an independent samples t-test for continuous data and Pearson's χ

Indexed as

critical care unitshospital pharmacy servicesintensive careon-callon-call pharmacistout-of-hoursresident pharmacist

Identifiers

PMID40438820
PMCPMC12119068

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.