Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40438824›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Artificial Intelligence Tools That Improve Medication Adherence in Patients With Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases: An Updated Review.

Esteban Zavaleta-Monestel, Luis Carlos Monge Bogantes, Silvia Chavarría-Rodríguez, Sebastián Arguedas-Chacón, Natalia Bastos-Soto, Jorge Villalobos-Madriz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Esteban Zavaleta-MonestelPharmacy, Hospital Clínica Bíblica, San José, CRI.
Luis Carlos Monge BogantesPharmacy, Hospital Clínica Bíblica, San José, CRI.
Silvia Chavarría-RodríguezFaculty of Pharmacy, Universidad Latina de Costa Rica, San José, CRI.
Sebastián Arguedas-ChacónResearch, Hospital Clínica Bíblica, San Jose, CRI.
Natalia Bastos-SotoFaculty of Pharmacy, Universidad Latina de Costa Rica, San José, CRI.
Jorge Villalobos-MadrizFaculty of Pharmacy, Universidad Latina de Costa Rica, San José, CRI.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review analyzes the use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools to improve medication adherence in patients with chronic non-communicable diseases, with a specific focus on their implementation in pharmaceutical care. Medication non-adherence remains a major barrier to effective chronic disease management, contributing to poor clinical outcomes and rising healthcare costs. AI offers promising, data-driven approaches to address this challenge through tools such as conversational agents, mobile applications, smart devices, and adherence classifiers. These tools enhance patient monitoring, education, and engagement, enabling personalized interventions to promote consistent medication use. The 26 included studies were evaluated based on their methodology, type of AI tool, healthcare setting, and reported impact on adherence outcomes. Most reported improvements in adherence, though variation in assessment methods limits comparability. Ethical, legal, and accessibility issues remain key challenges to wider adoption. Overall, AI represents a valuable and emerging strategy for supporting adherence and optimizing pharmaceutical care in chronic disease management.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence(ai)chronic disease managmentdigital health toolsmedication adherence strategiespharmaceutical care

Identifiers

PMID40438824
PMCPMC12119064

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.