ReviewCureus2025
Post-coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Cardiovascular Manifestations: A Systematic Review of Long-Term Risks and Outcomes.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pre-Infection COVID-19 Vaccination and Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes in Adults Without Preexisting Cardiovascular Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Unraveling the cardiovascular burden of long COVID: symptom profiles, underlying mechanisms, and clinical management insights.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Cardiac Tissue Damage in a Female Animal Post-COVID Model: Relevance of Chemokine-Mediated Inflammation.Viruses · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emerging evidence suggests that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) survivors face increased risks of cardiovascular complications, but the long-term risks, underlying mechanisms, and clinical implications remain incompletely characterized. This systematic review synthesizes current evidence on post-COVID-19 cardiovascular manifestations, evaluating their incidence, pathophysiology, and outcomes. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Fifteen observational studies (cohort, case-control, cross-sectional) meeting predefined eligibility criteria, confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, cardiovascular outcomes assessed ≥4 weeks post-infection, sample sizes >10, and peer-reviewed publication, were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The multinational studies (United States, Europe, Asia, South America) involved diverse populations (n=80-8,126,462), with follow-up durations ranging from three to 24 months. Mechanisms such as endothelial dysfunction, myocardial inflammation, and autonomic dysregulation were consistently supported across studies via imaging (e.g., cardiac MRI) and biomarkers (e.g., troponin, C-reactive protein (CRP)). Persistent arrhythmias and subclinical myocardial injury were directly demonstrated in 40-60% of patients. Worse outcomes were associated with hospitalization during acute infection, preexisting cardiovascular disease, and metabolic syndrome. Heterogeneity in follow-up durations may limit the detection of very-late-onset complications, though risks remained elevated across all intervals. Individualized management strategies should include cardiovascular imaging (echocardiography, MRI), biomarker profiling, and tailored pharmacotherapy (anti-inflammatory agents, anticoagulants). The ethical rationale for randomized trials is now strengthened by the clear evidence of long-term risks; ongoing trials are testing targeted anti-inflammatory and anticoagulant regimens. These findings underscore the necessity of systematic cardiovascular surveillance and risk-stratified care for COVID-19 survivors. Future research should prioritize extended follow-up studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to optimize interventions for this growing population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.