Evidence mapPaperPMID 40438995Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of translational myology2025

Serum protein biomarker signature of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Paul Dowling, Elisa Negroni, Capucine Trollet, Margit Zweyer, Dieter Swandulla, Kay Ohlendieck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of translational myology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paul DowlingDepartment of Biology, Maynooth University, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland; Kathleen Lonsdale Institute for Human Health Research, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare. paul.dowling@mu.ie.
Elisa NegroniCentre for Research in Myology U974, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Myology Institute, Paris. elisa.negroni@upmc.fr.
Capucine TrolletCentre for Research in Myology U974, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Myology Institute, Paris. capucine.trollet@upmc.fr.
Margit ZweyerGerman Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn. margit.zweyer@dzne.de.
Dieter SwandullaInstitute of Physiology, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Bonn. swandulla@uni-bonn.de.
Kay OhlendieckDepartment of Biology, Maynooth University, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland; Kathleen Lonsdale Institute for Human Health Research, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare. kay.ohlendieck@mu.ie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contrast to invasive skeletal muscle biopsies and the associated complexity of tissue sampling techniques and potential detrimental side effects, the alternative application of liquid biopsy procedures has considerable advantages concerning minimal invasiveness, repeated sampling options, assay robustness and cost effectiveness. This article outlines the current status of serum biomarkers used for diagnosing and characterizing Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), a primary muscle wasting disease of early childhood due to primary abnormalities in the extremely large DMD gene. Reviewed are important aspects of the discovery, characterization and diagnostic value of biofluid-based protein markers of dystrophinopathy. This includes an overview of traditional general skeletal muscle damage markers, such as creatine kinase, myoglobin and lactate dehydrogenase, which have been used for many decades in clinical applications to evaluate patients with muscular weakness. In addition, this article outlines the biochemical identification of novel biomarker candidates focusing on the usage of mass spectrometry-based proteomic surveys to establish comprehensive profiles of protein alterations in dystrophinopathy. Pathoproteomic serum markers of myonecrosis with great potential for improved patient screening, differential diagnosis, stage-specific prognosis and therapeutic monitoring include specific isoforms of muscle-derived cytosolic proteins, such as carbonic anhydrase isoform CA3 and fatty acid binding protein FABP3, as well as sarcomeric proteins, including specific isoforms of myosin light chain, myosin binding protein, troponin, and myomesin, in addition to peptide fragments derived from the giant protein titin. Biofluid-associated marker proteins of reactive myofibrosis include the extracellular matrix proteins fibronectin, osteopontin, collagen and matrix-metalloproteinases.

Identifiers

PMID40438995
PMCPMC12265423

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.