Trial reportEuropean heart journal2025
Optimal medical care and coronary flow capacity-guided myocardial revascularization vs usual care for chronic coronary artery disease: the CENTURY trial.
Trial report in European heart journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00756379 (Randomized Trial of Comprehensive Lifestyle Modifications, Optimal Pharmacological Treatment and PET Imaging for Detection and Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Trial of Comprehensive Lifestyle Modifications, Optimal Pharmacological Treatment and PET Imaging for Detection and Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiorgan Perfusion by PET: Potential Multiple Pathophysiology Interacting with the Heart to Guide Systemic and Cardiac Management.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Read the Data for Diverse Truths-and Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Versus Angiography.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- The impact of fast vs. slow rubidium-82 infusion profile on precision and accuracy of PET myocardial blood flow perfusion metrics using a 1-tissue compartment model.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThe randomized CENTURY trial tested the hypothesis that a comprehensive strategy integrating intense lifestyle modification and aggressive medical management to goals with revascularization reserved for severely reduced coronary flow capacity (CFC) by positron emission tomography (PET) would reduce risk factors, subsequent revascularization, death and myocardial infarction (MI) compared with standard of care in chronic stable coronary artery disease (CAD).
methodsParticipants were randomly assigned to standard or comprehensive care groups. Rest-stress PET quantified CFC for physiological CAD severity at baseline, 2, 5, and up to 11 years. The comprehensive care group reviewed PET results with frequent clinic visits and open 24/7 phone/email support. Standard care lacked supportive contact with blinded PET results that were unblinded only for severely reduced CFC with high mortality risk for potential revascularization.
resultsBetween 2009-2017, 515 patients were assigned to comprehensive care and 513 to standard care and followed for 5 or more years. Comprehensive vs standard care decreased risk factors and summed 5-year risk score (Δ-1.1 vs + 0.33; 95% confidence interval -1.84 to -0.97; P < .0001), decreased cumulative 11-year all-cause death (4.7% vs 8.2%; P = .023), death or MI (7.0% vs 11.1%; P = .024) late revascularization (9.5% vs 14.8%; P = .021) and major adverse cardiac events (20.5% vs 29.9%; P = .0006). Only 56 of 1028 (5.4%) CENTURY patients with chronic CAD had revascularization within 90 days predominantly guided by CFC severity.
conclusionsThe randomized CENTURY trial demonstrates that comprehensive integrated lifestyle modification and medical management towards goals with revascularization reserved for severely reduced CFC, significantly reduced risk factor scores, death, death or MI, and revascularization. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT00756379.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.