Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40439232›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2025

Polyphenol rewiring of the microbiome reduces methane emissions.

Bridget B McGivern, Jared B Ellenbogen, David W Hoyt, John A Bouranis, Brooke P Stemple, Rebecca A Daly, Samantha H Bosman, Matthew B Sullivan, Ann E Hagerman, Jeffrey P Chanton and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Bridget B McGivernDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80521, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9023-0018
Jared B EllenbogenDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80521, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1692-9044
David W HoytEnvironmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland 99352, WA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2857-719X
John A BouranisDepartment of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721, AZ, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5533-7570
Brooke P StempleDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80521, CO, United States.
Rebecca A DalyDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80521, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2223-7458
Samantha H BosmanDepartment of Earth Ocean and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee 32306, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1697-4080
Matthew B SullivanDepartment of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8398-8234
Ann E HagermanDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Miami University, Oxford 45056, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6099-0382
Jeffrey P ChantonDepartment of Earth Ocean and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee 32306, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3303-9708
Malak M TfailyDepartment of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721, AZ, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3036-2833
Kelly C WrightonDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80521, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0434-4217

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methane mitigation is regarded as a critical strategy to combat the scale of global warming. Currently, ~40% of methane emissions originate from microbial sources, which is causing strategies to suppress methanogens-either through direct toxic effects or by diverting their substrates and energy-to gain traction. Problematically, current microbial methane mitigation knowledge lacks detailed microbiome-centered insights, limiting translation across conditions and ecosystems. Here we utilize genome-resolved metatranscriptomes and metabolomes to assess the impact of a proposed methane inhibitor, catechin, on greenhouse gas emissions for high-methane-emitting peatlands. In microcosms, catechin drastically reduced methane emissions by 72%-84% compared to controls. Longitudinal sampling allowed for reconstruction of a catechin degradation pathway involving Actinomycetota and Clostridium, which break down catechin into smaller phenolic compounds within the first 21 days, followed by degradation of phenolic compounds by Pseudomonas_E from Days 21 to 35. These genomes co-expressed hydrogen-uptake genes, suggesting hydrogenases may act as a hydrogen sink during catechin degradation and consequently reduce hydrogen availability to methanogens. In support of this idea, there was decreased gene expression by hydrogenotrophic and hydrogen-dependent methylotrophic methanogens under catechin treatment. There was also reduced gene expression from genomes inferred to be functioning syntrophically with hydrogen-utilizing methanogens. We propose that catechin metabolic redirection effectively starves hydrogen-utilizing methanogens, offering a potent avenue for curbing methane emissions across diverse environments including ruminants, landfills, and constructed or managed wetlands.

Indexed as

BacteriaCatechinMethaneMicrobiotaPolyphenolsGreenhouse GasesHydrogenSoil MicrobiologyCatechinGreenhouse GasesHydrogenMethanePolyphenolsecologymetabolismmetagenomemetatranscriptomemethanemethanogensmicrobiomespolyphenolsrumenwetlands

Identifiers

PMID40439232
PMCPMC12203004

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.