Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40439296›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

Crops under stress: can we mitigate the impacts of climate change on agriculture and launch the 'Resilience Revolution'?

Ron Mittler, Rumyana Karlova, Diane C Bassham, Tracy Lawson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ron MittlerUniversity of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65201, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3192-7450
Rumyana KarlovaLaboratory of Plant Physiology, Plant Science Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen 6708, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0230-6428
Diane C BasshamIowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7411-9360
Tracy LawsonSchool of Lif Sciences, University of Essex Faculty of Science and Engineering, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4073-7221

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change is altering our environment, subjecting multiple agroecosystems worldwide to an increased frequency and intensity of abiotic stress conditions such as heat, drought, flooding, salinity, cold and/or their potential combinations. These stresses impact plant growth, yield and survival, causing losses of billions of dollars to agricultural productivity, and in extreme cases they lead to famine, migration and even wars. As the rate of change in our environment has dramatically accelerated in recent years, more research is urgently needed to discover and develop new ways and tools to increase the resilience of crops to different stress conditions. In this theme issue, new studies addressing the molecular, metabolic, and physiological responses of crops and other plants to abiotic stress challenges are discussed, as well as the potential to exploit these mechanisms in biotechnological applications aimed at preserving and/or increasing crop yield under our changing climate conditions.This article is part of the theme issue 'Crops under stress: can we mitigate the impacts of climate change on agriculture and launch the 'Resilience Revolution'?'

Indexed as

AgricultureClimate ChangeCrops, AgriculturalStress, Physiologicalagriculturebreedingclimate changecropstressyield

Identifiers

PMID40439296
PMCPMC12121375

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.