Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40440015›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Prevalence Rates, Perceptions of Risk, and Motivations for Nonmedical Cannabis Use in Pediatric Pain.

Joe Kossowsky, Christine Greco, Bridget A Nestor, Camila Koike, Nicole Tacugue, Andreas M Baumer, Elissa R Weitzman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joe KossowskyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Christine GrecoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Bridget A NestorDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Camila KoikeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Nicole TacugueDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Andreas M BaumerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Elissa R WeitzmanDivision of Addiction Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Mobile health applications in adolescent marijuana use: assessing the interplay among sleep, pain and inhibitory control - SupplementK01DA057374 · NIDA · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Joe Kossowsky · 2023 to 2026
$811k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA057374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Characterizing cannabis use (CU) rates in pediatric pain is critical as adolescence is a period of increased substance use and risk for negative outcomes. Youths with chronic pain may engage in CU to cope with symptoms. Objective: To examine CU rates, risk perceptions, and motivations for use among treatment-seeking youths with diagnosed pain disorders. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional survey study conducted from September 2021 to May 2024 at a pain treatment clinic at a pediatric hospital in the Northeast United States. Participants were 251 adolescents receiving treatment for diagnosed pain conditions. Of 312 approached, 40 did not complete the survey; 17 were excluded. Exposures: Validated self-report measures assessing demographics, pain, and substance use. Main Outcomes and Measures: CU rates, motivations for use, and perceived risks. Results: Of 245 adolescents providing complete data (mean [SD] age 16.9 [1.4] years; 168 [68.6%] female; 1 [0.4%] American Indian, 3 [1.2%] Asian, 3 [1.2%] Black, 19 [7.8%] Hispanic or Latino, and 201 [82.1%] White), 62 (25.3%) endorsed lifetime CU, with a mean (SD) age at first use of 15.3 (1.9) years. Among those endorsing CU, past-year prevalence was 90.2% (56 of 62 participants) and past-month prevalence was 64.5% (40 of 62 participants). The CU group was older (mean difference, 0.9 years; 95% CI, 0.5 to 1.2 years; P < .001), included fewer female participants (difference, -14.0%; 95% CI, -32.6% to -2.9%; P = .03), and reported greater pain interference scores (mean difference, 2.7; 95% CI, 0.8-4.6; P = .01) and depressive symptoms scores (mean difference, 6.2; 95% CI, 2.8-9.5; P < .001) compared with the no CU group. The no CU group perceived cannabis as riskier (odds ratio, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.28-4.39; P = .01). Among youths endorsing CU, 48 of 62 (77.4%) endorsed instrumental use (IU) to alleviate psychological or physical symptoms (primarily pain, sleep, and anxiety), representing an overall IU prevalence of 19.6% (48 of 245 participants). Youths reporting IU were younger (mean difference, -0.7 years; 95% CI, -1.3 to -0.1 years; P = .04) and reported greater functional disability scores (mean difference, -8.4; 95% CI, 2.1 to 12.6; P = .01) compared with the no IU group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, approximately 25% of treatment-seeking youths with chronic pain reported CU, with more than 75% using cannabis instrumentally to treat symptoms despite limited evidence supporting cannabis for pain, sleep, or anxiety. Given CU rates in this population, education about the risks of self-medication and the development of alternative coping strategies are needed.

Indexed as

Chronic PainMarijuana UseMotivationAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePrevalence

Identifiers

PMID40440015
PMCPMC12123470

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.