Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40441741›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2025

Malnutrition in infants aged under 6 months: prevalence and anthropometric assessment - analysis of 56 low- and middle-income country DHS datasets.

Marko Kerac, Philip T James, Marie McGrath, Eilise Brennan, Tim Cole, Charles Opondo, Séverine Frison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marko KeracPopulation Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK marko.kerac@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3745-7317
Philip T JamesENN, Kidlington, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5448-8193
Marie McGrathEmergency Nutrition Network, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0660-1873
Eilise BrennanENN, Kidlington, UK.
Tim ColePopulation, Policy and Practice Programme, UCL, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5711-8200
Charles OpondoDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8155-4117
Séverine FrisonPopulation Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1586-9564

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTackling malnutrition in infants aged under 6 months (u6m) is a major global priority yet evidence around this vulnerable group is weak. We aimed to support the rollout of new 2023 WHO guidelines by examining the burden of infant malnutrition and potential programme caseloads with new enrolment criteria.

methodsSecondary analysis of Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) datasets. We calculated the number of underweight (low weight-for-age), wasting (low weight-for-length), stunting (low length-for-age) and low birth weight (LBW) infants. We assessed data quality by recording extreme or missing values. We calculated the population-weighted prevalence of anthropometric deficit and extrapolated to all low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We regressed being underweight and wasti on infant, maternal and household characteristics using logistic regression.

resultsWe analysed 56 DHS surveys. There were more extreme (flagged) values for length-based measures (7.5% flagged for weight-for-length, 3.8% for length-for-age) than for weight-for-age (0.6% flagged). Overall, 17.4% of infants (95% CI: 16.9 to 18.0) were underweight, 15.5% (15.0-16.0) were wasted, 19.9% (19.3-20.5) were stunted and 15.0% (14.5-15.5) were LBW. This corresponds to an estimated burden in LMICs of 10.3 million underweight infants (4.1 million severely underweight), 9.2 million wasted (4.0 million severely wasted), 11.8 million stunted (5.4 million severely stunted) and 8.9 million LBW infants. Overlap of the indicators varied markedly in different regions/countries. Numerous factors were associated with both underweight and wasting; associations tended to be stronger and have greater biological plausibility with being underweight.

conclusionMalnutrition in infants u6m is a major problem in LMICs. Local epidemiology should inform case identification in contextualised care services across health and nutrition. Data quality and stronger associations with health and social characteristics support the use of underweight as a key enrolment criterion. Since vulnerability may be due to or exacerbated by multiple factors, management must go beyond feeding support to address wider infant, maternal and mental health and social circumstances through integrated, multidisciplinary care systems.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesInfant Nutrition DisordersAnthropometryFemaleGrowth DisordersHealth SurveysHumansInfantInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornMalePrevalenceThinnessGlobal HealthMarasmusNutritional and metabolic disordersPaediatricsPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID40441741
PMCPMC12142141

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.