ReviewThe Lancet. Public health2025
Effectiveness of workplace interventions for health promotion.
Review in The Lancet. Public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects on secondary outcomes following a three-month personalized app-based lifestyle intervention among working adults: a three-armed randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- A Sustainable Lifestyle Intervention Among Office Workers: Cluster Randomized Pilot and Feasibility Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Trial
- Traditional Chinese Medicine based intervention for reducing sedentariness and improving psychological well-being in office workers: a feasibility randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in public health · 2026Trial
- Job Problems in Suicide: National Violent Death Reporting System, 2020-2022.American journal of preventive medicine · 2026Article
- The Feasibility of an App-Based Worksite Health Promotion Program to Improve Mental Well-Being and Work-Related Vitality in University Hospital Workers: Process and Preliminary Effect Evaluation Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Employers' utilization of and collaboration with occupational health services in preventive occupational health and safety management.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2026Article
- From Assessment to Impact: How Workplace Health Screening Informs Staff Wellbeing in a University Setting.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Health-promoting lifestyle and associated factors among Chinese workers in Japan: A cross-sectional study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Occupational health nurse involvement and Bright 500 certification among Japanese small- and medium-sized enterprises: a repeated cross-sectional analysis of 4 annual health and productivity management survey waves.Journal of occupational health · 2026Observational
- Cohort profile: Guangdong Pharmaceutical University Occupational Health Cohort in Xishan Coal Electricity Group (GDPU-OHC).Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Employee expectations towards employer-provided workplace health promotion and mental health support: a 2025 cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- From checkups to change: Longitudinal changes in lifestyle-related factors following repeated occupational health assessments among 106 005 Swedish workers.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2026Article
- Perceptions of Changes in the Operating Environment and Their Impact on Occupational Health Care Practices: A Qualitative Interview Study.Health services insights · 2026Article
- Benefits of an Innovative 90-Day Longevity Workplace Program on Health in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Workplaces are an important setting for health promotion, offering established infrastructure, daily access to large populations, and opportunities to engage groups that are often under-represented in such initiatives. Although the effectiveness of workplace health promotion has been evaluated in reviews focusing on specific interventions, a comprehensive overview is needed. To address this gap, we present a quality-informed horizontal analysis encompassing 88 reviews and 339 meta-analysed effect estimates published between 2011 and 2024, covering a broad range of workplace health interventions. Mental health and stress reduction were the most frequently studied targets (36%), followed by weight management and cardiometabolic health (25%), health-related behaviours (22%), and musculoskeletal disorders and pain (17%). According to the GRADE assessment, 71 (21%) of the 339 meta-analysed effect estimates provided evidence of moderate quality, and the remainder were categorised as low or very low quality, with none classified as high quality. Mindfulness showed effectiveness across multiple stress and mental health outcomes, and cognitive behavioural techniques, stress management, physically oriented methods, and e-health interventions also showed some effectiveness. Multicomponent interventions had small but measurable effects on weight loss, glucose levels, fruit intake, and seasonal influenza vaccination uptake. A variety of behavioural, physical activity, environmental, multicomponent, and e-health interventions influenced physical activity and sedentary time at work. Consistent with findings found in non-occupational settings, effects at the individual level were generally modest but could be meaningful at both the workplace and population levels. In this Review we also discuss the broader public health implications of workplace health promotion, and highlight the strengths and limitations of the existing evidence and propose directions for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.