ArticleScientific reports2025
Synergistic effects of cardiovascular health and social isolation on adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between residential greenness and preeclampsia in Japan.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026Article
- Maternal Cardiovascular Health During Pregnancy and Offspring Developmental Delay.JAMA network open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) affect approximately 20% pregnant women, and their incidence is increasing. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of cardiovascular health (CVH) during pregnancy on APOs. We analyzed data from 14,930 pregnant women in the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study. CVH status during pregnancy was assessed using the eight components of Life's Essential 8. APOs were defined as composite outcomes encompassing preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, preterm birth, and small for gestational age. The numbers of participants with high, moderate, and low CVH status were 2891 (19.4%), 11,498 (77.0%), and 541 (3.6%), respectively. Poisson regression analyses with robust error variance, which adjusted for maternal age at conception, alcohol consumption, conception via in vitro fertilization, parity, psychological distress, social isolation, and household income, showed a positive association between moderate and low CVH levels and APOs (risk ratio and 95% confidence interval 1.15 [1.03-1.28] and 2.14 [1.78-2.58], respectively). Among pregnant women with low CVH, those who reported social isolation had a higher prevalence of APOs than did those without social isolation (36.4% vs. 27.4%). This difference was attenuated for pregnant women with high CVH status (13.6% vs. 13.1%). In conclusion, CVH status may be useful for assessing the risk of APOs. Socially isolated pregnant women are more vulnerable to the effects of low CVH status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.