ArticleScientific reports2025
Research on multi-algorithm and explainable AI techniques for predictive modeling of acute spinal cord injury using multimodal data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current applications of radiomics in neurotrauma.Neurosurgical review · 2026Review
- Application of intelligent technologies for dysphagia risk prediction: A scoping review.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning technology has been extensively applied in the medical field, particularly in the context of disease prediction and patient rehabilitation assessment. Acute spinal cord injury (ASCI) is a sudden trauma that frequently results in severe neurological deficits and a significant decline in quality of life. Early prediction of neurological recovery is crucial for the personalized treatment planning. While extensively explored in other medical fields, this study is the first to apply multiple machine learning methods and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis specifically to ASCI for predicting neurological recovery. A total of 387 ASCI patients were included, with clinical, imaging, and laboratory data collected. Key features were selected using univariate analysis, Lasso regression, and other feature selection techniques, integrating clinical, radiomics, and laboratory data. A range of machine learning models, including XGBoost, Logistic Regression, KNN, SVM, Decision Tree, Random Forest, LightGBM, ExtraTrees, Gradient Boosting, and Gaussian Naive Bayes, were evaluated, with Gaussian Naive Bayes exhibiting the best performance. Radiomics features extracted from T2-weighted fat-suppressed MRI scans, such as original_glszm_SizeZoneNonUniformity and wavelet-HLL_glcm_SumEntropy, significantly enhanced predictive accuracy. SHAP analysis identified critical clinical features, including IMLL, INR, BMI, Cys C, and RDW-CV, in the predictive model. The model was validated and demonstrated excellent performance across multiple metrics. The clinical utility and interpretability of the model were further enhanced through the application of patient clustering and nomogram analysis. This model has the potential to serve as a reliable tool for clinicians in the formulation of personalized treatment plans and prognosis assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.