Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40442486›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2025

From vestibular implant to cortex: electrically evoked vestibular responses.

Stan C J van Boxel, Joost J A Stultiens, Marc van Hoof, Bernd L Vermorken, Benjamin Volpe, Nils Guinand, Angélica Perez-Fornos, Erik D Gommer, Elke M J Devocht, Andreas Zwergal and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Stan C J van BoxelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Vestibular Disorders, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands. stan.van.boxel@mumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9647-5056
Joost J A StultiensDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Vestibular Disorders, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marc van HoofDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Vestibular Disorders, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Bernd L VermorkenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Vestibular Disorders, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Benjamin VolpeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Vestibular Disorders, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Nils GuinandService of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Angélica Perez-FornosService of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Erik D GommerMental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Elke M J DevochtDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Vestibular Disorders, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Andreas ZwergalGerman Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders (DSGZ), LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Marcus L F Janssen *Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Raymond van de Berg *Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Vestibular Disorders, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUnderstanding central vestibular pathways remains challenging and requires innovative measurement approaches. A vestibular implant offers unique access through specific electrical stimulation of the vestibular end organ. This study explored the feasibility of using vestibular implant stimulation to obtain vestibular evoked potentials, using electroencephalography (EEG).

methodsA vestibular implant was used in nine participants to evoke vestibular potentials by targeting the ampullary nerves of the semicircular canals. Short latency potentials were recorded using one channel EEG on all participants. In three participants, long latency potentials were recorded with 128 channel EEG. Responses were analyzed in terms of latency, shape, and location, and tested for correlation with stimulus intensity. EEG thresholds were compared with vestibular outcome thresholds (i.e., perception and vestibulo-ocular reflexes).

resultsThe measurement setup proved feasible for obtaining vestibular potentials. A consistent short latency response, identified as the vestibular brainstem response, was identified in five participants and across targeted nerves. Long latency responses revealed defined and localized independent components, with amplitudes correlating with stimulus intensity. Electrically evoked response thresholds matched thresholds of patient perception and eye movement recordings.

conclusionsVestibular implant stimulation elicited reproducible short and long latency responses. This approach creates new opportunities for investigating vestibular processing and evaluating vestibular implant responses.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexEvoked PotentialsVestibule, LabyrinthAdultAgedElectric StimulationElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReaction TimeReflex, Vestibulo-OcularElectroencephalographyEvoked potentialsVestibular brainstem responseVestibular cortexVestibular implant

Identifiers

PMID40442486
PMCPMC12122595

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.