ArticleCureus2025
A Case of Daptomycin-Induced Eosinophilic Pneumonia and Its Management Insights.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary infiltrates, arising from diverse etiologies such as infections, cardiac conditions, or parenchymal diseases, present a diagnostic challenge. Drug-induced pneumonitis, although less common, should be considered, especially when symptoms develop after medication initiation. This case report highlights a rare yet significant complication of antibiotic therapy, daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia (DIEP). A 56-year-old male with a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and renal insufficiency presented with pleuritic chest pain and a productive cough for two days. Chest X-ray and CT imaging revealed bilateral scattered airspace opacities and ground-glass opacities, suggesting pneumonia or pulmonary edema. Initially treated for healthcare-associated pneumonia, the patient's condition persisted despite therapy. His medical history included osteomyelitis treated with vancomycin, later switched to daptomycin. Two weeks after the switch, the patient developed new respiratory symptoms. A bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed to establish the diagnosis of eosinophilic pneumonia. BAL showed >25% eosinophils, confirming daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia. The antibiotic was discontinued, and prednisone 40 mg daily was initiated, leading to the resolution of symptoms. Daptomycin, an antibiotic commonly used to treat gram-positive infections, can rarely cause eosinophilic pneumonia, a rare adverse reaction characterized by pleuritic chest pain, dyspnea, and diffuse ground-glass opacities on imaging. The mechanism remains unclear but may involve surfactant binding, leading to alveolar epithelial injury. Diagnosis is confirmed through BAL, with eosinophilia greater than 25%. Management consists of discontinuing daptomycin and initiating steroids if necessary. This case underscores the importance of early recognition and prompt discontinuation of the offending drug, along with the use of steroids in cases with severe symptoms. BAL is a key diagnostic tool in confirming drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonia. In conclusion, daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia is a rare but significant complication requiring vigilance in patients treated with the drug. Early diagnosis and effective management are crucial for achieving favorable outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.