SynthesisFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025
Diagnostic value of olfactory function testing for Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Entropy-Based Analysis of Olfactory EEG as a Candidate Biomarker for Early Mild Cognitive Impairment Detection: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Single odor identification in subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's dementia.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Article
- Subjective and objective olfactory dysfunction and its screening value in patients with subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's dementia.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2026Article
- Review
- The olfactory-glymphatic syndrome: linking smell dysfunction, cognitive impairment and sleep disturbances in neuropathological disorders.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Olfactory Dysfunction and Cognitive Decline: Are They Related?Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025Review
- Olfactory Testing With Focus on Odor Identification for Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease in Mild Cognitive Impairment.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementiasReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is clinically classified into prodromal (asymptomatic), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD, and dementia due to AD. This study investigates the diagnostic value of olfactory function testing for AD and MCI. Methods: Systematic searches of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases were conducted up to February 1, 2024. Methodological quality was assessed using the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Effect sizes were combined using a random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird method), and statistical analyses were conducted using STATA 15.1 and Meta-Disc 1.4 software. Results: Twenty-five studies with 13,611 participants were included. For diagnosing AD, combined sensitivity (SE) was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.71-0.85), specificity (SP) was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69-0.84), and AUC was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82-0.88). For MCI, SE was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.54-0.78), SP was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.71-0.86), and AUC was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.84). Combined SE and SP for diagnosing AD and MCI were 0.58 (95% CI: 0.46-0.68) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.78-0.93), with an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74-0.82). SE and SP for AD or MCI were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.36-0.98) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.82-0.98), with an AUC of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.98). Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis reveal that olfactory function testing, as a simple, non-invasive, and cost-effective assessment method, demonstrates high diagnostic efficacy in the early identification of AD and MCI, showing promising clinical application. Systematic review registration: CRD42024520871.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.