ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Early prediction of colorectal adenoma risk: leveraging large-language model for clinical electronic medical record data.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Large Language Models in Colorectal Cancer Care and Clinical Decision Support: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Large Language Models for Heterogeneous Data Mining in Liver Disease: Framework Development and Retrospective Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Comment on Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Histopathological Classification in Colorectal Polyps.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Multimodal reasoning agent for enhanced ophthalmic decision-making: a preliminary real-world clinical validation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a non-invasive, radiation-free model for early colorectal adenoma prediction using clinical electronic medical record (EMR) data, addressing limitations in current diagnostic approaches for large-scale screening. Design: Retrospective analysis utilized 92,681 cases with EMR, spanning from 2012 to 2022, as the training cohort. Testing was performed on an independent test cohort of 19,265 cases from 2023. Several classical machine learning algorithms were applied in combination with the BGE-M3 large-language model (LLM) for enhanced semantic feature extraction. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is the major metric for evaluating model performance. The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method was employed to identify the most influential risk factors. Results: XGBoost algorithm, integrated with BGE-M3, demonstrated superior performance (AUC = 0.9847) in the validation cohort. Notably, when applied to the independent test cohort, XGBoost maintained its strong predictive ability with an AUC of 0.9839 and an average advance prediction time of 6.88 hours, underscoring the effectiveness of the BGE-M3 model. The SHAP analysis further identified 16 high-impact risk factors, highlighting the interplay of genetic, lifestyle, and environmental influences on colorectal adenoma risk. Conclusion: This study developed a robust machine learning-based model for colorectal adenoma risk prediction, leveraging clinical EMR and LLM. The proposed model demonstrates high predictive accuracy and has the potential to enhance early detection, making it well-suited for large-scale screening programs. By facilitating early identification of individuals at risk, this approach may contribute to reducing the incidence and mortality associated with colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.