SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2025
Urinary metabolites as biomarkers of dietary intake: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current diet assessment tools, such as food frequency questionnaires, may result in misclassification bias from measurement error and misreporting. These limitations can be mitigated by diet-related biomarkers in urine specimens, an emerging approach to characterize dietary intake. Objective: We conducted a systematic review to identify urinary biomarkers with utility in accurately assessing dietary intake, including individual foods and food groups. Method: We retrieved studies from 2000 to 2022 from databases including Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, and PubMed. Data extraction from included articles was conducted by two independent reviewers for cross validation. Articles identifying urinary biomarkers in relation to food groups/items with adult populations were included and were evaluated for bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal. Results: A total of 65 articles were included and categorized as biomarkers of fruit ( Conclusion: Current evidence suggests urinary biomarkers may have utility in describing intake of broad food groups, such as citrus fruits, cruciferous vegetables, whole grains, and soy foods, but may lack the ability to clearly distinguish individual foods. These findings indicate the potential of urinary biomarkers to monitor changes in dietary patterns. The improvement of diet assessment methodology is a key step toward strengthening research data validity and accurately measuring outcomes in chronic disease management. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42022308255, Prospero CRD42022308255.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.