Observational studyAndrology2026
Comparative efficacy of varicocelectomy and intrauterine insemination in varicocoele patients with mild semen abnormalities: An observational study.
Observational study in Andrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Varicocelectomy in men with varicocele-associated infertility: a narrative review of semen quality and reproductive outcomes.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVaricocoele is a common cause of male infertility, affecting spermatogenesis through increased testicular temperature, venous stasis, and oxidative stress. Microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy improves semen quality, whereas intrauterine insemination is widely used for mild male factor infertility. The comparative efficacy of these treatments in varicocoele patients with mild semen abnormalities remains unclear.
objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy and intrauterine insemination in improving clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in varicocoele patients with mild semen abnormalities and assess post-operative improvements in semen parameters following microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective cohort study involving 650 microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy patients from five medical centers and 700 intrauterine insemination patients from one center was conducted. Inclusion criteria included varicocoele diagnosed via ultrasonography, mild semen abnormalities (total motile sperm count ≥5 million), and at least one abnormal semen parameter. Primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. Secondary outcomes included sperm concentration, motility, and total motile sperm count changes post-microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and logistic regression.
resultsMicrosurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy patients demonstrated significant improvements in sperm concentration (35.2-43.3 × 10⁶/mL), motility (26%-38%), and total motile sperm count (18.8-34.9 × 10⁶, p < 0.001). Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were higher in the microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy group (35.23% and 31.08%) compared to the intrauterine insemination group (29.57% and 24.00%, p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy significantly increased pregnancy (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.12-1.83, p < 0.05) and live birth rates (OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.21-2.02, p < 0.05). DISCUSSION AND
conclusionMicrosurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy significantly enhances semen quality and achieves superior clinical pregnancy and live birth rates compared to intrauterine insemination for varicocoele patients with mild semen abnormalities. These findings suggest that microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy is a more effective treatment option, highlighting the importance of individualized treatment strategies and supporting the preferential use of surgical intervention in this specific patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.