Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40444722›Full record

ReviewFuture cardiology2025

Imaging and physiologic characteristics of coronary kinks.

Nikita Jhawar, Shahyar Michael Gharacholou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nikita JhawarDepartment of Cardiovascular Disease, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9071-5074
Shahyar Michael GharacholouDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary kinking represents an underrecognized diagnosis which typically arises as a complication of invasive cardiovascular procedures but may also be non-iatrogenic and nonatheromatous. Determining the etiology of coronary kinking poses a diagnostic dilemma with limited guidance in the medical literature. A stenotic lesion on invasive coronary angiography (ICA) may be attributable to intrinsic causes, such as atherosclerosis, fibromuscular dysplasia, coronary vasospasm, spontaneous coronary artery dissection, coronary kinks, and severe tortuosity, or extrinsic causes such as myocardial bridging. Lesions that appear angiographically atypical can be further elucidated with intracoronary imaging using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT), which help distinguish coronary kinks from other mimicking etiologies. Coronary kinks have the potential to cause ischemia, arrhythmia, and other structural complications, underscoring the importance of early and accurate detection. In this review, we summarize and appraise published data on coronary kinks. We also share a diagnostic schema on how to investigate coronary kinks with noninvasive and invasive techniques.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary Vessel AnomaliesCoronary VesselsCoronary AngiographyHumansTomography, Optical CoherenceUltrasonography, InterventionalatheromaatherosclerosiscatheterizationCoronary kinkfibromuscular dysplasia

Identifiers

PMID40444722
PMCPMC12150598

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.