Trial reportApplied psychophysiology and biofeedback2025
A Canonical Correlation Approach Towards Identifying Latent Neurofeedback Responses in Patients with Schizophrenia.
Trial report in Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with schizophrenia exhibit frontal gamma dysregulation, and associated impairments in cognitive function. To improve self regulation of frontal gamma activity, we designed a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial to test a novel neurofeedback (NFB) protocol, which rewards active maintenance of current or higher levels of frontal gamma coherence (gcoh-NFB). We report here unique treatment responses among participants with high versus low baseline working memory (WM) function. At baseline, among All participants, greater gamma dysregulation (higher resting gcoh) positively correlated with greater WM impairment. Among Active participants, completing gcoh-NFB training lowered the elevated baseline gcoh in participants with lower baseline WM function, and, conversely, increased the relatively lower baseline gcoh in participants with higher baseline WM function. In contrast, completing placebo-NFB produced no gcoh changes, regardless of baseline WM function. Compared to Placebo participants, all Active participants exhibited improved WM with training. The differing gcoh responses to NFB among Active participants suggested multiple neurophysiologic and WM responses during treatment. We selected canonical correlation analysis (CCA) to further evaluate potential latent and divergent responses. CCA identified two statistically significant canonical components; the stronger component representing the expected positive interactions between training-related WM responses, and the weaker component representing diverging interactions between training-related NFB and WM responses. Coefficients for the stronger (but not the weaker) component efficiently separated participants into distinct clusters with high, versus low, baseline WM, suggesting this response as the primary driver of divergent yet equally therapeutic effects observed for patients with low or high baseline WM function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40445258What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.