ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025
One Size Does Not Fit All: Reassessment of The Prognostic Nutritional Index Among Geriatric Distal Femur Fracture Patients.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated assessment of preoperative nutritional, inflammatory, and metabolic biomarkers and early outcomes in geriatric hip fracture surgery: a retrospective matched study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- The Utility of Baseline Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and Functional Status Among Hip Fracture and Distal Femur Fracture Patients.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPoor Nutrition status is often associated with perioperative complications and poor outcomes following orthopedic surgical interventions. The prognostic nutrition index (PNI), based on serum albumin and lymphocyte count, is commonly used to appraise nutrition status, with an index score > 38 indicating healthy nourishment, and lower scores generally indicating worse nutrition status. However, in many pathological settings, the components of PNI can often be acutely influenced. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognostic utility of PNI for 30-day mortality in geriatric distal femur fracture (DFF) patients.
methodsPatients ≥ 65 years with closed isolated DFF treated between 2005 and 2021 were identified by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. The primary outcome was comparison of 30-day mortality across PNI categories (< 35, 35-38, > 38). Sub-cohort analyses were performed for congestive heart failure (CHF) and dialysis patients. Logistic regression analyses identified independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis determined PNI thresholds and area under the curve (AUC) for the total cohort and subgroups.
resultsThe mean age of the 1,842 DFF patients (82.4% female, 17.6% male) was 76.7 years. The 30-day mortality rate was 5.0%, with higher rates in CHF (18.5%) and dialysis patients (8.3%). The mean PNI was 34.0, with 51.9% of patients having a PNI < 35. Each unit increase in PNI was associated with 7.0% decreased odds of mortality (OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89-0.97, p < 0.001). Total cohort ROC analysis revealed an AUC of 0.66. Sub-cohort ROC analysis of CHF patients and dialysis patients demonstrated limited predictive value with PNI, with an AUC of 0.61 and 0.47 respectively.
conclusionIn geriatric DFF patients, PNI was insufficient as a standalone prognostic tool for 30-day mortality risk. Combining PNI with markers of inflammation, frailty, or renal function may improve preoperative risk assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40445376What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.