ArticleThe Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association2025
Association of novel visceral obesity indices with 10-year risk of major cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Article in The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07204782 (Elevated Cardiovascular Risk Scores With Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 and Their Association With Non-Invasive Visceral Adiposity Indices), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Elevated Cardiovascular Risk Scores With Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 and Their Association With Non-Invasive Visceral Adiposity Indices
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A CVD Classification Model for Individuals With Obesity: Multi-Ethnic Validation Based on Multiple Metabolic Indicators.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2026Article
- Cumulative visceral fat burden and progression to advanced cardiovascular kidney metabolic syndrome in Chinese middle-aged and older adults.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Visceral Adiposity Index and Its Usefulness in the Prediction of Cardiometabolic Disorders.Nutrients · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of mortality among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with visceral adiposity being a key contributor to increased CVD risk. Novel visceral obesity indices (NVOI), including the lipid accumulation product (LAP), visceral adiposity index (VAI), and metabolic score of visceral fat (METS-VF), offer improved visceral adipose tissue assessment and may enhance CVD risk prediction. This study aimed to evaluate the association of these indices with 10-year CVD risk and their predictive performance in adults with T2DM.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in the diabetes outpatient clinic and family medicine units of Suez Canal University in Ismailia, Egypt over 15 months starting in February 2023. A total of 397 randomly selected patients with T2DM participated. A structured interview questionnaire was used to collect demographics, medical, family, and lifestyle-related data. Clinical data such as blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and laboratory data such as fasting blood glucose (FBG) and lipid profile were obtained. NVOIs were calculated using standardized equations, and 10-year CVD risk was determined using the 2019 WHO/ISH CVD risk-laboratory-based chart. Logistic regression was used to assess the associations between NVOIs and high CVD risk, while receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate its predictive accuracy.
resultsHigh CVD risk (≥ 20% 10-year risk) was identified in 40.5% of participants and was significantly associated with higher LAP, VAI, and METS-VF levels (p < 0.001). VAI was associated with 3.18 times higher odds of having a high 10-year CVD risk (95% CI 1.61-6.26, p < 0.001) in males and 4.16 (95% CI 1.26-13.68, p = 0.019) in females. METS-VF had the highest predictive ability, with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 7.39 (95% CI 1.03-52.85, p = 0.046) in males and 7.80 (95% CI 1.53-39.92, p = 0.014) in females while, LAP showed no significant association. The area under the curve (AUC) values indicated acceptable to excellent predictive accuracy for all indices, with METS-VF and VAI generally outperforming LAP. VAI performs best in males and METS-VF in females. Sensitivity ranged from 63.92 to 87.5%, while specificity varied between 73.79% and 94.51%. Positive predictive values (PPVs) were higher in males (77-92.5%), whereas negative predictive values (NPVs) were higher in females (88.9-93%).
conclusionsHigh CVD risk was significantly associated with elevated VAI, METS-VF, and LAP; however, only VAI and METS-VF emerged as independent predictors. These indices demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy, reinforcing their clinical relevance. Given their superior discriminative ability, incorporating VAI and METS-VF into routine assessments could enhance CVD risk prediction in adults with T2DM, allowing for earlier intervention and better management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.