SynthesisPloS one2025
Unraveling the global landscape of Elizabethkingia antibiotic resistance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Phenotypic Characterization of ClinicalInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Phylogenetic Relationships and Structural Conservation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe emergence of antibiotic-resistant Elizabethkingia strains poses a significant challenge in clinical settings. This systematic review and meta-analysis provide a comprehensive assessment of the prevalence of antibiotic resistance among Elizabethkingia isolates across different regions worldwide.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus from 1998 to January 9, 2024, using predefined search strategies. Eligible studies reporting antibiotic resistance in Elizabethkingia were included. A random-effects model was applied to estimate resistance proportions and assess heterogeneity. Additional analyses, including meta-regression, subgroup evaluations, and assessments of outliers and influential studies, were performed to explore resistance trends and evaluate publication bias. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist, and all statistical analyses were conducted using R with the metafor package.
resultsA total of 1,016 articles were identified, of which 34 studies (47 reports) met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis indicated high resistance to ceftazidime (88.5% of isolates, 95% CI: 21.1%-99.5%) with no significant heterogeneity. Resistance to rifampin was 12.5% (95% CI: 5.9%-24.7%), showing substantial heterogeneity, while ciprofloxacin resistance was 27.9% (95% CI: 13.8%-48.4%) with considerable heterogeneity. Among specific antibiotics, cefotaxime resistance was 96.1% (220 isolates), meropenem resistance was 92.4% (353 isolates), and gentamicin resistance was 77.7% (356 isolates). Additionally, sulfamethoxazole resistance was 46.1% (176 out of 360 isolates, 95% CI: 23.5%-70.4%), displaying significant heterogeneity.
conclusionThis study highlights the widespread antibiotic resistance in Elizabethkingia, underscoring the urgent need for targeted treatment strategies and enhanced surveillance programs. The findings emphasize the importance of monitoring local resistance patterns to guide clinical decision-making. Future research should focus on elucidating resistance mechanisms and genetic diversity to develop practical therapeutic approaches and mitigate the global health impact of Elizabethkingia infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.