Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40446293›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2025

Impact of Digital Health on Patient-Provider Relationships in Respiratory Secondary Care Based on Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence: Systematic Review.

Michaela Senek, David Drummond, Hilary Pinnock, Kjeld Hansen, Anshu Ankolekar, Úna O'Connor, Apolline Gonsard, Oleksandr Mazulov, Katherina Bernadette Sreter, Christina Thornton and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Michaela Senek *School of Medicine and Population Health, Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4226-2220
David DrummondDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, University Hospital Necker Enfants Malades, APHP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7324-4992
Hilary PinnockUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5976-8386
Kjeld HansenEuropean Lung Foundation, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1518-0863
Anshu AnkolekarThe D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW - Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7681-1254
Úna O'ConnorDepartment of Respiratory, University Hospital Limerick, HSE Mid West, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5580-1398
Apolline GonsardDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, University Hospital Necker Enfants Malades, APHP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1943-6237
Oleksandr MazulovFirst Pediatric Department, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9860-7588
Katherina Bernadette SreterDepartment of Pulmonology, University Hospital Centre "Sestre Milosrdnice", Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1671-5540
Christina ThorntonDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6820-6211
Pippa PowellEuropean Lung Foundation, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1828-8332

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital health technology adoption has accelerated in respiratory care, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic, supporting various applications from self-management to telerehabilitation. While these technologies have transformed health care delivery, their impact on the patient-provider relationship in specialist respiratory care remains poorly understood.

objectiveThis study aims to systematically review the literature on the impact of digital health technology on the patient-provider relationship in respiratory secondary care settings and to understand the factors that enhance or diminish this relationship.

methodsIn December 2023, we conducted a systematic review following Cochrane methodology, searching MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane databases, and PsycINFO. We included qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies examining digital health interventions in respiratory secondary care. Trained volunteers from the European Respiratory Society CONNECT Clinical Research Collaboration performed screening and data extraction. We conducted a qualitative meta-synthesis of findings, followed by an abductive quantitative data analysis. A total of 3 stakeholder workshops were held to interpret findings collaboratively with patients and health care professionals.

resultsFrom 15,779 papers screened, 97 met the inclusion criteria (55 qualitative/mixed-methods studies, 42 quantitative studies). Studies covered various respiratory conditions, including COPD (32%), asthma (26%), and COVID-19 (13%). Four main themes emerged: trust (foundational to the relationship), adoption factors (including clinical context and implementation drivers), confidence in technology (based on functionality and the evidence base), and connection (encompassing communication and a caring presence). Digital health technology can either enhance or diminish trust between patients and clinicians, with patients' perceptions of the motivations behind its implementation being crucial. While technology facilitated access and communication, remote consultations risked depersonalisation, particularly when not balanced with in-person interactions. Self-monitoring and access to information empowered patients and promoted more equitable patient-provider relationships.

conclusionsDigital health technology can either strengthen or weaken patient-provider relationships in respiratory care, with effects impacted by adoption factors, confidence in technology, connection, and patient empowerment. Maintaining trust in the era of digital care requires transparent implementation of motivations, consideration of individual circumstances, and reliable technology that supports rather than replaces the therapeutic relationship.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42024493664; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024493664.

Indexed as

Professional-Patient RelationsSecondary Health CareTelemedicineCOVID-19Digital HealthHumansQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2digital healthpatient-provider relationshiprespiratory caresystematic reviewtelemedicinetrust

Identifiers

PMID40446293
PMCPMC12166327

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.