ArticleNature communications2025
Multi-tissue expression and splicing data prioritise anatomical subsite- and sex-specific colorectal cancer susceptibility genes.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- RNA splicing and cardiovascular disease: a guide for cardiologists.European heart journal · 2026Review
- Human-Centered Innovation: Precision Nutrition and the Future of Food.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Clusters of Anthropometric Features in Colorectal Cancer Patients with Synchronous Metastases and Their Association with Overall Survival and RAS Mutation.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Article
- Key genes and pathway differences between serrated polyps and conventional adenomas: insights from multi-omics.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Multi-tissue expression and splicing data prioritise anatomical subsite- and sex-specific colorectal cancer susceptibility genes.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies have suggested numerous colorectal cancer (CRC) susceptibility genes, but their causality and therapeutic potential remain unclear. To prioritise causal associations between gene expression/splicing and CRC risk (52,775 cases; 45,940 controls), we perform a transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) across six tissues with Mendelian randomisation and colocalisation, integrating sex- and anatomical subsite-specific analyses. Here we reveal 37 genes with robust causal links to CRC risk, ten of which have not previously been reported by TWAS. Most likely causal genes with evidence of cancer cell dependency show elevated expression linked to risk, suggesting therapeutic potential. Notably, SEMA4D, encoding a protein targeted by an investigational CRC therapy, emerges as a key risk gene. We also identify a female-specific association with CRC risk for CCM2 expression and subsite-specific associations, including LAMC1 with rectal cancer risk. These findings offer valuable insights into CRC molecular mechanisms and support promising therapeutic avenues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.