ReviewNature protocols2025
Fibrous polyisocyanide hydrogels for 3D cell culture applications.
Review in Nature protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Water-Soluble Fluorogenic Probe to Quantify Azide Concentrations in Biologically Relevant Environments.Biomacromolecules · 2026Article
- Camouflage Protein-Engineered Extracellular Vesicles Alleviate TMJ-OA by Hijacking Caspase-1 to Suppress Pyroptosis.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2026Article
- Microscale Mechanical Cues in Hydrogels: Engineering Strategies to Modulate Cell Fates in Three Dimensions.Cell biomaterials · 2026Article
- Organoid research: new concepts and new technologies.Burns & trauma · 2026Review
- Invasin-functionalized PIC hydrogels enable long-term 3D culture of epithelial organoids.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models based on hydrogels are rapidly evolving into a prominent tool for tissue engineering, mechanobiology, disease modeling and drug screening. While a vast variety of synthetic gels have emerged in recent years, they fail to penetrate the market substantially for two major reasons: they poorly mimic the extracellular matrix or they are difficult to use in gel formation and cell extraction. Mimicking the complexity of nature is challenging: the extracellular matrix plays a crucial role in cell development and function, which goes well beyond simple mechanical support. Recently, we introduced polyisocyanide (PIC) hydrogels for 3D cell culture applications. The fibrous architecture and associated (non)linear mechanical behavior closely mimic the physical properties of biogels such as collagen and fibrin. As fully synthetic materials, PIC gels benefit from high tailorability and reproducibility. Moreover, the thermoresponsive properties of PIC gels make them easy to handle in the lab; the gels form instantly at 37 °C and cells are easily extracted after cooling to 5 °C. The potential of PIC gels has been demonstrated in a quickly expanding library of papers discussing different cell lines, primary cells and organoids, as well as in vivo experiments. This manuscript provides protocols on how to handle PIC gels in the chemistry and cell biology laboratories. Material preparation requires 72 h. Cell encapsulation takes 1 h and the time for downstream analysis depends on the (commercial) methods used. The protocols described are suitable for researchers with expertise in cell culture and molecular biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40447888What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.