ArticleReproductive health2025
Strengthening intersectoral collaboration for adolescent sexual and reproductive health: a community-embedded intervention in Ebonyi state, Nigeria.
Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdolescent sexual and reproductive health (ASRH) is a critical global health concern, demanding multifaceted approaches for effective intervention. This paper presents a qualitative exploration of an innovative community-embedded intervention aimed at enhancing intersectoral collaboration to improve ASRH outcomes.
methodsA qualitative study design was employed to explore the types, processes, and factors that enabled or constrained intersectoral collaborations in implementing a community-embedded intervention for ASRH in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Thirty in-depth interviews and 18 focus group discussions were conducted with policymakers, health service providers, teachers, community gatekeepers, parents, and adolescents. The interview transcripts were coded in NVivo 12. The outputs of the coded transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis and presented as narratives.
resultsKey findings highlight the emergence of three predominant collaboration models: horizontal integration between healthcare and education sectors, horizontal integration across various governmental agencies (formal providers) and non-governmental organizations (informal providers), and diagonal integration bridging gaps between community stakeholders and service providers. The processes underpinning these collaborations emphasize the significance of trust-building, shared goals, and clear communication. The study identifies the pivotal role of champions and intermediaries in facilitating collaboration, along with the necessity for a supportive institutional framework. The enabling factors include robust leadership commitment, dedicated funding mechanisms, and a favorable policy environment. Conversely, challenges stemming from resource constraints, conflicting interests, and organizational silos hindered collaboration efforts.
conclusionThis research underscores the potential of community-embedded interventions to strengthen intersectoral collaboration for the acceptability and adoption of ASRH strategies. It offers a valuable resource for policymakers, healthcare professionals, and stakeholders seeking to enhance ASRH outcomes through collaborative efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.