Evidence mapPaperPMID 40448251Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025

Gendered experience of people living with type 2 diabetes in rural and urban Mexico: an ethnographic study.

Ileana B Heredia-Pi, Emanuel Orozco-Núñez, Carlos M Guerrero-López, Nadia Cerecer-Ortiz, Enai Ojeda-Arroyo, Betania Allen-Leigh, Stephen Jan, Laura Downey, Edson Serván-Mori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ileana B Heredia-Pi *Center for Health Systems Research, The National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9998-9239
Emanuel Orozco-Núñez *Center for Health Systems Research, The National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6550-7385
Carlos M Guerrero-LópezCenter for Health Systems Research, The National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6405-5217
Nadia Cerecer-OrtizCenter for Health Systems Research, The National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5200-7894
Enai Ojeda-ArroyoCenter for Health Systems Research, The National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7188-593X
Betania Allen-LeighCenter for Population Health Research, The National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3200-5917
Stephen JanThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2839-1405
Laura DowneyThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9563-7113
Edson Serván-MoriCenter for Health Systems Research, The National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico. eservan@insp.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9820-8325

Funding

the Mexican Association of Pharmaceutical Research Industries, A.C. (AMIIF by its acronym in Spanish) 2268/1772/S6-21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyse the gendered experience of women and men living with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) related to diagnosis, treatment, and control in rural and urban contexts of Mexico. METHODOLOGY: Qualitative ethnographic study. Thirty-six adults (21 women and 15 men) with a confirmed diagnosis of T2D for more than five years residing in urban and rural localities in Baja California and Morelos participated in this qualitative study between November 2022 and February 2023. A semi-structured interview guide was used to explore lifestyle changes, social and community networks, work and living conditions, experience with the disease, health services and associated economic burden. The analysis was guided by four conceptual domains of gender influence: identity, norms and roles, relationships and institutionalised gender.

resultsWomen were more likely to report difficulty in accepting the diagnosis of T2D and stress in coping with the disease and related lifestyle changes. Men were more likely to report impact of T2D on their job and role as household providers, and their inability to contribute to the care of other family members. Women were more likely to report leaving their jobs, taking on caregiving responsibilities for family members, experiencing difficulty in accessing healthcare, and prioritizing their health in comparison to men. Men reported receiving more support from their partners, faced fewer financial barriers to care access, and had more freedom to pay for their medications and seek treatment in private care. However, they were also less adherent to treatment and disease care measures.

conclusionsGender appears to substantially influence experience of living with T2D. Women were more likely to provide family support and less likely to receive it and reported greater financial barriers to care access in comparison to men. Men were more likely to experience stress in relation to their employment as primary providers for their family, and less likely to adhere to prescribed medical management of their condition. These findings should be considered in more targeted health policy interventions to promote greater gender equity in the care of those with T2D in Mexico.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Rural PopulationUrban PopulationAdultAgedAnthropology, CulturalFemaleHumansMaleMexicoMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSex FactorsGenderHealth inequalitiesMexicoNon-communicable diseasesType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID40448251
PMCPMC12125857

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.