ArticleSynapse (New York, N.Y.)2025
Efficacy of Mitochondrial Transfer in Healing Toxin-Induced Damage to Neuromuscular Junction, an Empirical Study.
Article in Synapse (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal Remodeling of Presynaptic Terminals in Human Neuromuscular Junctions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- New Insights into Neuromuscular Junction Biology: Evidence from Human and Animal Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuromuscular diseases and damage affect many people of all ages and are responsible for an exorbitant medical cost, more than $200 million annually. Accordingly, finding an appropriate model to investigate potential curative interventions is necessary. One currently used involves the application of toxic agents on skeletal muscle followed by mitochondrial transplant therapy. A question regarding this model is whether such toxins impact not only muscle tissue but also the neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) responsible for exciting the muscle tissue. This question was addressed here by forming four experimental groups of C57BL/six mice (10-14 per group) that were 8-12 weeks of age: 1) controls whose muscles had not been injured or treated, 2) muscles taken from mice that were injured and then treated with mitochondrial supplement, 3) muscles that had not been injured but were still treated with mitochondria, and 4) muscles that were injured and received no mitochondrial treatment. Several pre- and postsynaptic features of NMJs were subject to immunofluorescent staining procedures before having morphological features assessed with confocal microscopy. Results revealed that only postsynaptic acetylcholine (ACh) receptors showed any significant (p < 0.05) between-group differences, including decreased area size and perimeter length around ACh receptor clusters in injured NMJs. However, presynaptic nerve terminal branching was not different (p > 0.05) among treatment groups, and structural features were not different between groups with the exception of dispersion of postsynaptic receptors. Overall, these results suggest that skeletal muscles damaged with toxin accurately mimic what occurs during toxin-induced damage and post-injury recovery and can be used as a faithful model of occurrences during damage to NMJs as a result of muscle damage along with recovery from that insult.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.