ArticleNeuroradiology2025
White matter microstructural changes across the menstrual cycle: a differential tractography study.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential tractography suggests a "left-to-whole" white matter degeneration pattern in aging.Brain imaging and behavior · 2026Article
- Global white matter microstructure changes induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in cocaine use disorder: a longitudinal correlational tractography study.Brain imaging and behavior · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study explores white matter (WM) microstructural changes across different phases of the menstrual cycle (MC) in healthy women.
methodsUsing the publicly available Hormon Health Study dataset, we performed a differential tractography study on Q-space Trajectory Imaging sequences from 22 participants, assessing WM microstructural changes between three specific time points: (a) Menses phase (M-phase), (b) Ovulation phase (O-phase), and (c) Mid-Luteal phase (ML-phase). The difference between specific MC-phase scans were calculated by the scheme “phase - previous phase” of the MC in three distinct analyses: (a) Analysis 1 (O-phase – M-Phase); (b) Analysis 2 (ML-phase – O-phase); (c) Analysis 3 (M-phase – ML-phase). Quantitative anisotropy (QA), was employed to quantify changes in WM structure. A p-value corrected for false discovery rate (p-FDR) < 0.05 was used to identify statistically significant results.
resultsSignificant reductions in QA were widespread observed in Analysis 1 (O-phase – M-Phase; p-FDR = 0.00026802), and Analysis 2 (ML-phase – O-phase; p-FDR = 0.00000242), while increased QA values were observed in Analysis 3 (M-phase – ML-phase; p-FDR = 0.00002051).
conclusionThis study provides evidence of cyclic WM microstructural changes during the MC. These results may offer insights into the mechanisms underlying MC-related brain physiological and pathological changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40448738What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.